Hydrogen

Formula: H₂
Molecular weight: 2.01588
IUPAC Standard InChI: InChI=1S/H2/h1H
IUPAC Standard InChIKey: UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N
CAS Registry Number: 1333-74-0
Chemical structure:
This structure is also available as a 2d Mol file or as a computed 3d SD file
The 3d structure may be viewed using Java or Javascript.
Isotopologues:
Other names: Dihydrogen; o-Hydrogen; p-Hydrogen; Molecular hydrogen; H2; UN 1049; UN 1966
Permanent link for this species. Use this link for bookmarking this species for future reference.
Information on this page:
Other data available:
- Reaction thermochemistry data: reactions 51 to 100, reactions 101 to 150, reactions 151 to 200, reactions 201 to 250, reactions 251 to 300, reactions 301 to 350, reactions 351 to 400, reactions 401 to 450, reactions 451 to 500, reactions 501 to 550, reactions 551 to 600, reactions 601 to 621
- Mass spectrum (electron ionization)
- Fluid Properties
Data at other public NIST sites:
- Electron-Impact Ionization Cross Sections (on physics web site)
- Gas Phase Kinetics Database
Options:
- Switch to calorie-based units

Data at NIST subscription sites:

NIST subscription sites provide data under the NIST Standard Reference Data Program, but require an annual fee to access. The purpose of the fee is to recover costs associated with the development of data collections included in such sites. Your institution may already be a subscriber. Follow the links above to find out more about the data in these sites and their terms of usage.

Gas phase thermochemistry data

Go To: Top, Phase change data, Reaction thermochemistry data, Henry's Law data, Gas phase ion energetics data, Ion clustering data, Constants of diatomic molecules, References, Notes

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
S°_{gas,1 bar}	130.680 ± 0.003	J/mol*K	Review	Cox, Wagman, et al., 1984	CODATA Review value
S°_{gas,1 bar}	130.68	J/mol*K	Review	Chase, 1998	Data last reviewed in March, 1977

Gas Phase Heat Capacity (Shomate Equation)

C_p° = A + B*t + C*t² + D*t³ + E/t²
H° − H°_298.15= A*t + B*t²/2 + C*t³/3 + D*t⁴/4 − E/t + F − H
S° = A*ln(t) + B*t + C*t²/2 + D*t³/3 − E/(2*t²) + G
C_p = heat capacity (J/mol*K)
H° = standard enthalpy (kJ/mol)
S° = standard entropy (J/mol*K)
t = temperature (K) / 1000.

View plot Requires a JavaScript / HTML 5 canvas capable browser.

View table.

Temperature (K)	298. to 1000.	1000. to 2500.	2500. to 6000.
A	33.066178	18.563083	43.413560
B	-11.363417	12.257357	-4.293079
C	11.432816	-2.859786	1.272428
D	-2.772874	0.268238	-0.096876
E	-0.158558	1.977990	-20.533862
F	-9.980797	-1.147438	-38.515158
G	172.707974	156.288133	162.081354
H	0.0	0.0	0.0
Reference	Chase, 1998	Chase, 1998	Chase, 1998
Comment	Data last reviewed in March, 1977; New parameter fit October 2001	Data last reviewed in March, 1977; New parameter fit October 2001	Data last reviewed in March, 1977; New parameter fit October 2001

Phase change data

Go To: Top, Gas phase thermochemistry data, Reaction thermochemistry data, Henry's Law data, Gas phase ion energetics data, Ion clustering data, Constants of diatomic molecules, References, Notes

Data compiled as indicated in comments:
TRC - Thermodynamics Research Center, NIST Boulder Laboratories, Chris Muzny director

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
T_triple	0.	K	N/A	Roder, Childs, et al., 1973	TRC
T_triple	13.95	K	N/A	Clusius and Weigand, 1940	Uncertainty assigned by TRC = 0.06 K; see property X for dP/dT for c-l equil.; TRC
T_triple	13.96	K	N/A	Henning and Otto, 1936	Uncertainty assigned by TRC = 0.05 K; temperature measured with He gas thermometer; TRC
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
P_triple	0.	bar	N/A	Roder, Childs, et al., 1973	TRC
P_triple	0.0721	bar	N/A	Henning and Otto, 1936	Uncertainty assigned by TRC = 0.0004 bar; TRC
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
T_c	33.18	K	N/A	Onnes, Crommelin, et al., 1917	Uncertainty assigned by TRC = 0.2 K; derived from P-V-T measurements; TRC
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
P_c	13.00	bar	N/A	Onnes, Crommelin, et al., 1917	Uncertainty assigned by TRC = 0.0119 bar; derived from vapor pressure extrapolated to Tc; TRC
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
ρ_c	15.4	mol/l	N/A	Onnes, Crommelin, et al., 1917	Uncertainty assigned by TRC = 2. mol/l; by extrapolation of rectilinear diameter to Tc; TRC

Antoine Equation Parameters

log₁₀(P) = A − (B / (T + C))
P = vapor pressure (bar)
T = temperature (K)

View plot Requires a JavaScript / HTML 5 canvas capable browser.

Temperature (K)	A	B	C	Reference	Comment
21.01 to 32.27	3.54314	99.395	7.726	van Itterbeek, Verbeke, et al., 1964	Coefficents calculated by NIST from author's data.

In addition to the Thermodynamics Research Center (TRC) data available from this site, much more physical and chemical property data is available from the following TRC products:

Reaction thermochemistry data

Go To: Top, Gas phase thermochemistry data, Phase change data, Henry's Law data, Gas phase ion energetics data, Ion clustering data, Constants of diatomic molecules, References, Notes

Data compiled as indicated in comments:
MS - José A. Martinho Simões
M - Michael M. Meot-Ner (Mautner) and Sharon G. Lias
ALS - Hussein Y. Afeefy, Joel F. Liebman, and Stephen E. Stein
B - John E. Bartmess

Note: Please consider using the reaction search for this species. This page allows searching of all reactions involving this species. A general reaction search form is also available. Future versions of this site may rely on reaction search pages in place of the enumerated reaction displays seen below.

Reactions 1 to 50

(solution) + Hydrogen (solution) = 2 (solution)

By formula: C₈Co₂O₈ (solution) + H₂ (solution) = 2C₄HCoO₄ (solution)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	19.7 ± 0.8	kJ/mol	EqS	Rathke, Klingler, et al., 1992	solvent: Supercritical carbon dioxide; Temperature range: 333-453 K. The results corrected for 1 atm pressure of H2 are 16.7 kJ/mol and -17.6 J/(mol K) Rathke, Klingler, et al., 1992; MS
Δ_rH°	13.0 ± 0.9	kJ/mol	EqS	Bor, 1986	solvent: n-Hexane; Temperature range: ca. 300-420 K; MS
Δ_rH°	26.4	kJ/mol	KinS	Alemdaroglu, Penninger, et al., 1976	solvent: n-Heptane; The reaction enthalpy relies on the experimental values for the forward and reverse activation enthalpies, 72.4 and 46.0 kJ/mol, respectively Alemdaroglu, Penninger, et al., 1976. A rather different value has, however, been reported for the activation enthalpy of the forward reaction, 104.6 kJ/mol Ungváry, 1972; MS
Δ_rH°	27.6	kJ/mol	EqS	Alemdaroglu, Penninger, et al., 1976	solvent: n-Heptane; Temperature range: 353-428 K; MS
Δ_rH°	13.4	kJ/mol	EqS	Ungváry, 1972	solvent: n-Heptane; Temperature range: 307-428 K. The results corrected for 1 atm pressure of H2 are 18.0 kJ/mol and -10.9 J/(mol K) Rathke, Klingler, et al., 1992; MS

H₃⁺ + Hydrogen = (H₃⁺ • )

By formula: H₃⁺ + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	29. ± 2.	kJ/mol	AVG	N/A	Average of 4 out of 11 values; Individual data points
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	72.8 to 72.8	J/mol*K	RNG	N/A	Range of 6 values; Individual data points

C₁₁H₂O₁₁Os (solution) + (solution) = Hydrogen (g) + (solution)

By formula: C₁₁H₂O₁₁Os (solution) + CO (solution) = H₂ (g) + C₁₂O₁₂Os₃ (solution)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-37.7 ± 9.6	kJ/mol	ES/KS	Poë, Sampson, et al., 1993	solvent: Decalin; Calculated from equilibrium and kinetic data Poë, Sampson, et al., 1993.; MS
Δ_rH°	-77.4 ± 9.7	kJ/mol	N/A	Poë, Sampson, et al., 1993	solvent: Decalin; Calculated from data for the reactions Os3(CO)10(H)2(solution) + CO(solution) = Os3(CO)11(H)2(solution) (hrxn [kJ/mol]=-39.7±1.3, srxn [J/(mol K)]=-80.3±3.8) and Os3(CO)11(H)2(solution) + CO(solution) = Os3(CO)12(solution) + H2(g) (hrxn [kJ/mol]=-37.7±9.6, srxn [J/(mol K)]=-32.6±27.6) Poë, Sampson, et al., 1993.; MS

+ Hydrogen =

By formula: C₆H₁₀ + H₂ = C₆H₁₂

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-118. ± 6.	kJ/mol	AVG	N/A	Average of 8 values; Individual data points

(cr) + Hydrogen (g) = 2C₈H₆CrO₃ (cr)

By formula: C₁₆H₁₀Cr₂O₆ (cr) + H₂ (g) = 2C₈H₆CrO₃ (cr)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-13.9 ± 4.0	kJ/mol	RSC	Landrum and Hoff, 1985	The reaction enthalpy was obtained from the value for the reaction 2Cr(Cp)(CO)3(H)(cr) + 1,3-cy-C6H8(solution) = [Cr(Cp)(CO)3]2(cr) + cy-C6H10(solution), -98.3 ± 3.8 kJ/mol Landrum and Hoff, 1985, together with the calculated enthalpy for 1,3-cy-C6H8(l) + H2(g) = cy-C6H10(l), -112.2±1.3 Pedley, 1994. It was assumed that 1,3-cy-C6H8 and cy-C6H10 have similar solution enthalpies in heptane; MS
Δ_rH°	-15.1 ± 4.2	kJ/mol	DSC	Landrum and Hoff, 1985	The reaction enthalpy was obtained from the value for the reaction 2Cr(Cp)(CO)3(H)(cr) + 1,3-cy-C6H8(solution) = [Cr(Cp)(CO)3]2(cr) + cy-C6H10(solution), -98.3 ± 3.8 kJ/mol Landrum and Hoff, 1985, together with the calculated enthalpy for 1,3-cy-C6H8(l) + H2(g) = cy-C6H10(l), -112.2±1.3 Pedley, 1994. It was assumed that 1,3-cy-C6H8 and cy-C6H10 have similar solution enthalpies in heptane; MS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₆H₁₂ = C₆H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-125. ± 3.	kJ/mol	AVG	N/A	Average of 8 values; Individual data points

(H₃⁺ • Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 2)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 2H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	14. ± 0.8	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase; M
Δ_rH°	13.	kJ/mol	HPMS	Beuhler, Ehrenson, et al., 1983	gas phase; M
Δ_rH°	14.	kJ/mol	HPMS	Beuhler, Ehrenson, et al., 1983	gas phase; deuterated; M
Δ_rH°	17.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase; M
Δ_rH°	7.5	kJ/mol	HPMS	Bennett and Field, 1972	gas phase; Entropy change is questionable; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	72.8	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase; M
Δ_rS°	70.7	J/mol*K	HPMS	Beuhler, Ehrenson, et al., 1983	gas phase; M
Δ_rS°	67.4	J/mol*K	HPMS	Beuhler, Ehrenson, et al., 1983	gas phase; deuterated; M
Δ_rS°	82.8	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase; M
Δ_rS°	45.2	J/mol*K	HPMS	Bennett and Field, 1972	gas phase; Entropy change is questionable; M

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₇H₁₄ = C₇H₁₆

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-125. ± 2.	kJ/mol	AVG	N/A	Average of 6 values; Individual data points

+ Hydrogen =

By formula: C₈H₁₆ + H₂ = C₈H₁₈

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-125. ± 6.	kJ/mol	AVG	N/A	Average of 7 values; Individual data points

+ = Hydrogen

By formula: H^- + H⁺ = H₂

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	1675.3	kJ/mol	N/A	Shiell, Hu, et al., 2000	gas phase; Given: 139714.8±1 cm-1 at 0K, or 399.465±0.003 kcal/mol; B
Δ_rH°	1675.3	kJ/mol	N/A	Pratt, McCormack, et al., 1992	gas phase; 399.46±0.01 kcal/mol at 0K; 0.94 correction, Gurvich, Veyts, et al.; B
Δ_rH°	1675.3	kJ/mol	D-EA	Lykke, Murray, et al., 1991	gas phase; Reported: 6082.99±0.15 cm-1, or 0.754195(18) eV; B
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rG°	1649.3 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	H-TS	Shiell, Hu, et al., 2000	gas phase; Given: 139714.8±1 cm-1 at 0K, or 399.465±0.003 kcal/mol; B
Δ_rG°	1649.3	kJ/mol	H-TS	Lykke, Murray, et al., 1991	gas phase; Reported: 6082.99±0.15 cm-1, or 0.754195(18) eV; B

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₅H₈ = C₅H₁₀

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-112.7 ± 0.54	kJ/mol	Chyd	Allinger, Dodziuk, et al., 1982	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-112. ± 0.8	kJ/mol	Chyd	Roth and Lennartz, 1980	liquid phase; solvent: Cyclohexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-109.0 ± 1.8	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Jarrett, et al., 1973	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-110. ± 0.8	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers and McLafferty, 1971	liquid phase; solvent: Hydrocarbon; ALS
Δ_rH°	-111.6 ± 0.3	kJ/mol	Chyd	Dolliver, Gresham, et al., 1937	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -112.6 ± 0.3 kJ/mol; At 355 °K; ALS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₈H₁₄ = C₈H₁₆

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-102.	kJ/mol	Chyd	Doering, Roth, et al., 1989	liquid phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-103. ± 0.8	kJ/mol	Chyd	Roth and Lennartz, 1980	liquid phase; solvent: Cyclohexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-96.40 ± 0.71	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers, Von Voithenberg, et al., 1978	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-96.1 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Meador, 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-97.40 ± 0.63	kJ/mol	Chyd	Conn, Kistiakowsky, et al., 1939	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -98.4 ± 0.2 kJ/mol; At 355 K; ALS

0.5C₃₆H₈₄Cl₂P₄Rh₂ (solution) + Hydrogen (g) = C₁₈H₄₄ClP₂Rh (solution)

By formula: 0.5C₃₆H₈₄Cl₂P₄Rh₂ (solution) + H₂ (g) = C₁₈H₄₄ClP₂Rh (solution)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-98.8 ± 2.7	kJ/mol	RSC	Wang, Rosini, et al., 1995	solvent: Benzene; The reaction enthalpy was calculated from the enthalpies of the reactions Rh[P(i-Pr)3]2(Cl)(H)2(solution) + t-BuNC(solution) = Rh[P(i-Pr)3]2(Cl)(CN-t-Bu)(solution) + H2(g), -41.4 ± 1.7 kJ/mol, and 0.5{Rh[P(i-Pr)3]2(Cl)}2(solution) + t-BuNC(solution) = Rh[P(i-Pr)3]2(Cl)(CN-t-Bu)(solution), -140.2 ± 2.1 kJ/mol Wang, Rosini, et al., 1995. The enthalpy of solution of {Rh[P(i-Pr)3]2(Cl)}2(cr) was measured as 20.1 ± 1.3 kJ/mol Wang, Rosini, et al., 1995.; MS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₆H₁₀ = C₆H₁₂

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-100.8 ± 0.63	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers, Crooks, et al., 1987	liquid phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-101.3 ± 0.50	kJ/mol	Chyd	Allinger, Dodziuk, et al., 1982	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-96.3 ± 0.2	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1958	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-96.3 ± 0.2	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-96.3 ± 0.2	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1957, 2	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

2 Hydrogen + =

By formula: 2H₂ + C₆H₁₀ = C₆H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-252. ± 2.	kJ/mol	Chyd	Fang and Rogers, 1992	liquid phase; solvent: Cyclohexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-253.9 ± 2.7	kJ/mol	Chyd	Molnar, Rachford, et al., 1984	liquid phase; solvent: Dioxane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-251.8 ± 1.5	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Mallon, et al., 1973	liquid phase; solvent: Glacial acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-251.2 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	Chyd	Kistiakowsky, Ruhoff, et al., 1936	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -253.3 ± 0.63 kJ/mol; At 355 °K; ALS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₇H₁₂ = C₇H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-101.9 ± 0.63	kJ/mol	Chyd	Allinger, Dodziuk, et al., 1982	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-98.3 ± 0.8	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers and McLafferty, 1971	liquid phase; solvent: Hydrocarbon; ALS
Δ_rH°	-98.58 ± 0.46	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1958	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-98.58 ± 0.46	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₇H₁₂ = C₇H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-106.9 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Allinger, Dodziuk, et al., 1982	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-101. ± 0.8	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers and McLafferty, 1971	liquid phase; solvent: Hydrocarbon; ALS
Δ_rH°	-104.1 ± 0.50	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1958	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-104.1 ± 0.50	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₆H₁₀ = C₆H₁₂

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-115.9 ± 0.96	kJ/mol	Chyd	Allinger, Dodziuk, et al., 1982	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-112.5 ± 0.08	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1958	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-112.3 ± 0.2	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-112.2 ± 0.3	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1957, 2	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

C₃H₇⁺ + Hydrogen = (C₃H₇⁺ • )

By formula: C₃H₇⁺ + H₂ = (C₃H₇⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	10.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1976	gas phase; Entropy change calculated or estimated, DG<, Δ_rH<; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	84.	J/mol*K	N/A	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1976	gas phase; Entropy change calculated or estimated, DG<, Δ_rH<; M

Free energy of reaction

Δ_rG° (kJ/mol)	T (K)	Method	Reference	Comment
4.	170.	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1976	gas phase; Entropy change calculated or estimated, DG<, Δ_rH<; M

+ Hydrogen = ( • )

By formula: Co⁺ + H₂ = (Co⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	82. ± 4.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(O K)=76.1 kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=86.2 J/mol*K; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	92.0	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(O K)=76.1 kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=86.2 J/mol*K; M

Enthalpy of reaction

Δ_rH° (kJ/mol)	T (K)	Method	Reference	Comment
73.2 (+9.6,-0.)		CID	Haynes and Armentrout, 1996	gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M

+ Hydrogen =

By formula: C₅H₁₀ + H₂ = C₅H₁₂

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-126.6 ± 2.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Molnar, Rachford, et al., 1984	liquid phase; solvent: Dioxane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-125.0 ± 1.8	kJ/mol	Chyd	Molnar, Rachford, et al., 1984	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-122.6 ± 2.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers and Skanupong, 1974	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-119. ± 1.	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers and McLafferty, 1971	liquid phase; solvent: Hydrocarbon; ALS

+ Hydrogen =

By formula: C₇H₁₂ + H₂ = C₇H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-119.5 ± 0.65	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers, Crooks, et al., 1987	liquid phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-116.1 ± 0.54	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1958	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-116.1 ± 0.54	kJ/mol	Eqk	Turner and Garner, 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-120.1 ± 0.3	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1957, 2	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₇H₁₂ = C₇H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-110. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Roth and Lennartz, 1980	liquid phase; solvent: Cyclohexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-108.2 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Meador, et al., 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-108.9 ± 0.63	kJ/mol	Chyd	Conn, Kistiakowsky, et al., 1939	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -111.0 ± 0.08 kJ/mol; At 355 K; ALS

3 Hydrogen + =

By formula: 3H₂ + C₇H₈ = C₇H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-305. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Roth, Klaerner, et al., 1983	liquid phase; solvent: Isooctane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-294.9 ± 1.6	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Meador, et al., 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-301.7 ± 1.3	kJ/mol	Chyd	Conn, Kistiakowsky, et al., 1939	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -304.8 ± 0.04 kJ/mol; at 355 K; ALS

2 Hydrogen + =

By formula: 2H₂ + C₆H₁₀ = C₆H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-231.4 ± 3.0	kJ/mol	Chyd	Molnar, Rachford, et al., 1984	liquid phase; solvent: Dioxane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-227.0 ± 2.8	kJ/mol	Chyd	Molnar, Rachford, et al., 1984	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-223.4 ± 0.63	kJ/mol	Chyd	Dolliver, Gresham, et al., 1937	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -225.4 ± 0.63 kJ/mol; At 355 °K; ALS

+ 3 Hydrogen =

By formula: C₅H₅N + 3H₂ = C₅H₁₁N

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-193.8 ± 0.75	kJ/mol	Eqk	Hales and Herington, 1957	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -202.2 ± 0.75 kJ/mol; At 400-550 K; ALS
Δ_rH°	-193.0 ± 2.1	kJ/mol	Eqk	Burrows and King, 1935	liquid phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -188.3 kJ/mol; At 423-443 K; ALS

+ Hydrogen =

By formula: C₈H₁₆ + H₂ = C₈H₁₈

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-107.	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Nettleton, et al., 1958	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-112.9 ± 0.3	kJ/mol	Chyd	Dolliver, Gresham, et al., 1937	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -114.0 ± 0.3 kJ/mol; At 355 °K; ALS
Δ_rH°	-119.6 ± 3.3	kJ/mol	Chyd	Crawford and Parks, 1936	liquid phase; ALS

+ Hydrogen =

By formula: C₃H₆ + H₂ = C₃H₈

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-123.4 ± 5.0	kJ/mol	Chyd	Kistiakowsky and Nickle, 1951	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -124.9 ± 2.1 kJ/mol; ALS
Δ_rH°	-125.0 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	Chyd	Kistiakowsky, Ruhoff, et al., 1935	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -126.00 ± 0.054 kJ/mol; At 355 °K; ALS

( • ) + Hydrogen = ( • • )

By formula: (Co⁺ • CH₄) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • H₂ • CH₄)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	95.8	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993, 2	gas phase; switching reaction(Co+).2H2, Δ_rS(440 K); Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993; M

Enthalpy of reaction

Δ_rH° (kJ/mol)	T (K)	Method	Reference	Comment
73. (+3.,-0.)		SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993, 2	gas phase; switching reaction(Co+).2H2, Δ_rS(440 K); Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993; M

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₃H₆O = C₃H₈O

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-68.74 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	Cm	Wiberg, Crocker, et al., 1991	liquid phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-55.23	kJ/mol	Eqk	Buckley and Herington, 1965	gas phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-55.40 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	Chyd	Dolliver, Gresham, et al., 1938	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -56.1 ± 0.4 kJ/mol; At 355 °K; ALS

( • Hydrogen ) + = ( • • )

By formula: (Co⁺ • H₂) + CH₄ = (Co⁺ • CH₄ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	91.2	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993, 2	gas phase; switching reaction(Co+)2H2, Δ_rS(440 K); Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993; M

Enthalpy of reaction

Δ_rH° (kJ/mol)	T (K)	Method	Reference	Comment
94.6 (+5.0,-0.)		SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993, 2	gas phase; switching reaction(Co+)2H2, Δ_rS(440 K); Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993; M

+ Hydrogen =

By formula: C₈H₁₄ + H₂ = C₈H₁₆

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-110. ± 1.	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers and McLafferty, 1971	liquid phase; solvent: Hydrocarbon; ALS
Δ_rH°	-110.1 ± 0.2	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1958	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-110.1 ± 0.2	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₈H₁₄ = C₈H₁₆

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-144. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Roth, Adamczak, et al., 1991	liquid phase; see Doering, Roth, et al., 1989; ALS
Δ_rH°	-144.0 ± 1.8	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers, Von Voithenberg, et al., 1978	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-134.9 ± 0.88	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Meador, 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

( • Hydrogen ) + = ( • 2)

By formula: (Co⁺ • H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 2H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	75. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=71.1 kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=103. J/mol*K; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	103.	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=71.1 kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=103. J/mol*K; M

( • 2 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 3)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 2H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 3H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	44. ± 2.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=40. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=85.8 J/mol*K; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	85.8	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=40. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=85.8 J/mol*K; M

( • 3 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 4)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 3H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 4H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	44. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=40. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=105. J/mol*K; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	101.	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=40. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=105. J/mol*K; M

( • 4 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 5)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 4H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 5H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	22. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=18. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=91.6 J/mol*K; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	94.1	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=18. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=91.6 J/mol*K; M

( • 5 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 6)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 5H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 6H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	20. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=17. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=99.6 J/mol*K; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	99.2	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=17. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=99.6 J/mol*K; M

( • 6 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 7)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 6H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 7H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	6. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=3. kJ/mol; Δ_rS(300 K)=75.3 J/mol*K; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	75.3	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=3. kJ/mol; Δ_rS(300 K)=75.3 J/mol*K; M

(H₃⁺ • 3 Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 4)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • 3H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 4H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	7.2 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase; M
Δ_rH°	10.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	74.9	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase; M
Δ_rS°	80.8	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase; M

(H₃⁺ • 2 Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 3)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • 2H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 3H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	13. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase; M
Δ_rH°	16.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase; M
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	77.4	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase; M
Δ_rS°	84.5	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase; M

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₈H₁₆ = C₈H₁₈

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-118.2 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers, Dejroongruang, et al., 1992	liquid phase; solvent: Cyclohexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-119.7 ± 2.2	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers and Siddiqui, 1975	liquid phase; solvent: n-Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-114.6 ± 0.59	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Jarrett, et al., 1973	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

2 Hydrogen + =

By formula: 2H₂ + C₈H₁₄ = C₈H₁₈

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-268.7 ± 1.1	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers, Dagdagan, et al., 1979	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; ALS
Δ_rH°	-262.8 ± 0.67	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Jarrett, et al., 1973	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-263.	kJ/mol	Chyd	Sicher, Svoboda, et al., 1966	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₈H₁₄O = C₈H₁₆O

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-55.73	kJ/mol	Chyd	Wiberg, Crocker, et al., 1991	liquid phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-53.14	kJ/mol	Chyd	Wiberg, Crocker, et al., 1991	solid phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-39.0	kJ/mol	Chyd	Wiberg, Crocker, et al., 1991	gas phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-53.14 ± 0.59	kJ/mol	Cm	Wiberg, Crocker, et al., 1991	solid phase; ALS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₇H₁₂ = C₇H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-111.4 ± 0.37	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers, Crooks, et al., 1987	liquid phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-106.3 ± 0.46	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1958	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-106.3 ± 0.46	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner and Garner, 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

2 Hydrogen + =

By formula: 2H₂ + C₇H₁₀ = C₇H₁₄

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-208.9 ± 0.3	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Mallon, et al., 1973	liquid phase; solvent: Glacial acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-212.4 ± 0.63	kJ/mol	Chyd	Conn, Kistiakowsky, et al., 1939	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -214.5 ± 0.2 kJ/mol; At 355 K; ALS

Hydrogen + =

By formula: H₂ + C₇H₁₀ = C₇H₁₂

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-137. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	Chyd	Doering, Roth, et al., 1988	gas phase; ALS
Δ_rH°	-141.5 ± 1.2	kJ/mol	Chyd	Rogers, Choi, et al., 1980	liquid phase; solvent: Hexane; Author was aware that data differs from previously reported values; ALS
Δ_rH°	-138.6 ± 0.88	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Meador, et al., 1957	liquid phase; solvent: Acetic acid; ALS

+ Hydrogen =

By formula: C₃H₆O + H₂ = C₃H₈O

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-84.3 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	Cm	Wiberg, Crocker, et al., 1991	liquid phase; solvent: Triglyme; Heat of hydrogenation; ALS
Δ_rH°	-69.55 ± 0.76	kJ/mol	Eqk	Connett, 1972	gas phase; At 473-524 K; ALS
Δ_rH°	-65.77 ± 0.67	kJ/mol	Chyd	Buckley and Cox, 1967	gas phase; ALS

2 Hydrogen + =

By formula: 2H₂ + C₆H₈ = C₆H₁₂

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	-224.4 ± 1.2	kJ/mol	Chyd	Turner, Mallon, et al., 1973	liquid phase; solvent: Glacial acetic acid; ALS
Δ_rH°	-229.6 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	Chyd	Kistiakowsky, Ruhoff, et al., 1936	gas phase; Reanalyzed by Cox and Pilcher, 1970, Original value = -231.7 ± 0.4 kJ/mol; At 355 °K; ALS

(solution) + Hydrogen (solution) = 2 (solution)

By formula: C₁₀Mn₂O₁₀ (solution) + H₂ (solution) = 2C₅HMnO₅ (solution)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	36.4 ± 1.3	kJ/mol	EqS	Klingler R.J. and Rathke, 1992	solvent: Supercritical carbon dioxide; Temperature range: 373-463 K; MS

Henry's Law data

Go To: Top, Gas phase thermochemistry data, Phase change data, Reaction thermochemistry data, Gas phase ion energetics data, Ion clustering data, Constants of diatomic molecules, References, Notes

Data compiled by: Rolf Sander

Henry's Law constant (water solution)

k_H(T) = k°_H exp(d(ln(k_H))/d(1/T) ((1/T) - 1/(298.15 K)))
k°_H = Henry's law constant for solubility in water at 298.15 K (mol/(kg*bar))
d(ln(k_H))/d(1/T) = Temperature dependence constant (K)

k°_H (mol/(kg*bar))	d(ln(k_H))/d(1/T) (K)	Method	Reference	Comment
0.00078	500.	L	N/A
0.00078	640.	Q	N/A	Only the tabulated data between T = 273. K and T = 303. K from missing citation was used to derive k_H and -Δ k_H/R. Above T = 303. K the tabulated data could not be parameterized by equation (reference missing) very well. The partial pressure of water vapor (needed to convert some Henry's law constants) was calculated using the formula given by missing citation. The quantities A and α from missing citation were assumed to be identical.
0.00078	490.	L	N/A
0.00078		R	N/A

Gas phase ion energetics data

Go To: Top, Gas phase thermochemistry data, Phase change data, Reaction thermochemistry data, Henry's Law data, Ion clustering data, Constants of diatomic molecules, References, Notes

Data evaluated as indicated in comments:
HL - Edward P. Hunter and Sharon G. Lias
L - Sharon G. Lias

Data compiled as indicated in comments:
B - John E. Bartmess
LL - Sharon G. Lias and Joel F. Liebman
LBLHLM - Sharon G. Lias, John E. Bartmess, Joel F. Liebman, John L. Holmes, Rhoda D. Levin, and W. Gary Mallard
LLK - Sharon G. Lias, Rhoda D. Levin, and Sherif A. Kafafi
RDSH - Henry M. Rosenstock, Keith Draxl, Bruce W. Steiner, and John T. Herron

View reactions leading to H₂⁺ (ion structure unspecified)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
IE (evaluated)	15.42593 ± 0.00005	eV	N/A	N/A	L
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Proton affinity (review)	422.3	kJ/mol	N/A	Hunter and Lias, 1998	HL
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Gas basicity	394.7	kJ/mol	N/A	Hunter and Lias, 1998	HL

Ionization energy determinations

IE (eV)	Method	Reference	Comment
15.425927	EVAL	Shiner, Gilligan, et al., 1993	T = 0K; LL
15.425930	EVAL	Shiner, Gilligan, et al., 1993	T = 0K; LL
15.425932 ± 0.000002	S	McCormack, Gilligan, et al., 1989	T = 0K; LL
15.429558 ± 0.00001	LS	Glab and Hessler, 1987	T = 0K; LBLHLM
15.433174 ± 0.00001	LS	Glab and Hessler, 1987	T = 0K; LBLHLM
15.425942 ± 0.00001	LS	Glab and Hessler, 1987	T = 0K; LBLHLM
15.425932	S	Eyler, Short, et al., 1986	T = 0K; LBLHLM
15.425929	S	Eyler, Short, et al., 1986	T = 0K; LBLHLM
15.425930 ± 0.000027	N/A	Eyler, Short, et al., 1986	LBLHLM
15.5 ± 1.0	S	Farber, Srivastava, et al., 1982	LBLHLM
15.98	PE	Kimura, Katsumata, et al., 1981	LLK
15.43	PE	Bieri, Schmelzer, et al., 1980	LLK
15.42589	EVAL	Huber and Herzberg, 1979	LLK
16. ± 1.	EI	Farber and Srivastava, 1977	LLK
15.4	PI	Rabalais, Debies, et al., 1974	LLK
15.43	PE	Lee and Rabalais, 1974	LLK
15.42589 ± 0.00005	S	Herzberg and Jungen, 1972	LLK
15.4256 ± 0.0001	S	Takezawa, 1970	RDSH
15.38186 ± 0.00031	PE	Asbrink, 1970	RDSH
15.44 ± 0.01	EI	Lossing and Semeluk, 1969	RDSH
15.4256	S	Herzberg, 1969	RDSH
15.431 ± 0.022	TE	Villarejo, 1968	RDSH
15.439 ± 0.015	PE	Collin and Natalis, 1968	RDSH
15.43	CI	Cermak, 1968	RDSH
15.37 ± 0.05	EI	Kerwin, Marmet, et al., 1963	RDSH
15.4269 ± 0.0016	S	Beutler and Junger, 1936	RDSH

Appearance energy determinations

Ion	AE (eV)	Other Products	Method	Reference	Comment
H⁺	18.078 ± 0.003	H	PIPECO	Weitzel, Mahnert, et al., 1994	T = 0K; LL
H⁺	18.0 ± 0.2	H	EI	Crowe and McConkey, 1973	LLK
H⁺	17.28 ± 0.16	H^-	EI	Locht and Momigny, 1971	LLK
H⁺	17.3	H^-	EI	Curran, Laboratories	RDSH

De-protonation reactions

+ = Hydrogen

By formula: H^- + H⁺ = H₂

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	1675.3	kJ/mol	N/A	Shiell, Hu, et al., 2000	gas phase; Given: 139714.8±1 cm-1 at 0K, or 399.465±0.003 kcal/mol; B
Δ_rH°	1675.3	kJ/mol	N/A	Pratt, McCormack, et al., 1992	gas phase; 399.46±0.01 kcal/mol at 0K; 0.94 correction, Gurvich, Veyts, et al.; B
Δ_rH°	1675.3	kJ/mol	D-EA	Lykke, Murray, et al., 1991	gas phase; Reported: 6082.99±0.15 cm-1, or 0.754195(18) eV; B
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rG°	1649.3 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	H-TS	Shiell, Hu, et al., 2000	gas phase; Given: 139714.8±1 cm-1 at 0K, or 399.465±0.003 kcal/mol; B
Δ_rG°	1649.3	kJ/mol	H-TS	Lykke, Murray, et al., 1991	gas phase; Reported: 6082.99±0.15 cm-1, or 0.754195(18) eV; B

Ion clustering data

Go To: Top, Gas phase thermochemistry data, Phase change data, Reaction thermochemistry data, Henry's Law data, Gas phase ion energetics data, Constants of diatomic molecules, References, Notes

Data compiled by: Michael M. Meot-Ner (Mautner) and Sharon G. Lias

Note: Please consider using the reaction search for this species. This page allows searching of all reactions involving this species. Searches may be limited to ion clustering reactions. A general reaction search form is also available.

Clustering reactions

Ar⁺ + Hydrogen = (Ar⁺ • )

By formula: Ar⁺ + H₂ = (Ar⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	93.7	kJ/mol	FA	Shul, Passarella, et al., 1987	gas phase; switching reaction(Ar+)Ar, Δ_rH>; Dehmer and Pratt, 1982

+ Hydrogen = ( • )

By formula: CHO⁺ + H₂ = (CHO⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	16.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975, 2	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	85.8	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975, 2	gas phase

CH₅⁺ + Hydrogen = (CH₅⁺ • )

By formula: CH₅⁺ + H₂ = (CH₅⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	7.87 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Kudaka, et al., 1991	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	50.6	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Kudaka, et al., 1991	gas phase

(CH₅⁺ • Hydrogen ) + = (CH₅⁺ • 2)

By formula: (CH₅⁺ • H₂) + H₂ = (CH₅⁺ • 2H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	7.45 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Kudaka, et al., 1991	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	67.8	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Kudaka, et al., 1991	gas phase

(CH₅⁺ • 2 Hydrogen ) + = (CH₅⁺ • 3)

By formula: (CH₅⁺ • 2H₂) + H₂ = (CH₅⁺ • 3H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	6.74 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Kudaka, et al., 1991	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	94.6	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Kudaka, et al., 1991	gas phase

(CH₅⁺ • 3 Hydrogen ) + = (CH₅⁺ • 4)

By formula: (CH₅⁺ • 3H₂) + H₂ = (CH₅⁺ • 4H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	6.57 ± 0.42	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Kudaka, et al., 1991	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	108.	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Kudaka, et al., 1991	gas phase

C₃H₇⁺ + Hydrogen = (C₃H₇⁺ • )

By formula: C₃H₇⁺ + H₂ = (C₃H₇⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	10.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1976	gas phase; Entropy change calculated or estimated, DG<, Δ_rH<
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	84.	J/mol*K	N/A	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1976	gas phase; Entropy change calculated or estimated, DG<, Δ_rH<

Free energy of reaction

Δ_rG° (kJ/mol)	T (K)	Method	Reference	Comment
4.	170.	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1976	gas phase; Entropy change calculated or estimated, DG<, Δ_rH<

( • ) + Hydrogen = ( • • )

By formula: (Co⁺ • CH₄) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • H₂ • CH₄)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	95.8	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993, 2	gas phase; switching reaction(Co+).2H2, Δ_rS(440 K); Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993

Enthalpy of reaction

Δ_rH° (kJ/mol)	T (K)	Method	Reference	Comment
73. (+3.,-0.)		SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993, 2	gas phase; switching reaction(Co+).2H2, Δ_rS(440 K); Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993

( • ) + Hydrogen = ( • • )

By formula: (Co⁺ • H₂O) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • H₂ • H₂O)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	103.	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993, 2	gas phase; Δ_rS(530 K)

Enthalpy of reaction

Δ_rH° (kJ/mol)	T (K)	Method	Reference	Comment
83. (+3.,-0.)		SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993, 2	gas phase; Δ_rS(530 K)

+ Hydrogen = ( • )

By formula: Co⁺ + H₂ = (Co⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	82. ± 4.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(O K)=76.1 kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=86.2 J/mol*K
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	92.0	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(O K)=76.1 kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=86.2 J/mol*K

Enthalpy of reaction

Δ_rH° (kJ/mol)	T (K)	Method	Reference	Comment
73.2 (+9.6,-0.)		CID	Haynes and Armentrout, 1996	gas phase; guided ion beam CID

( • Hydrogen ) + = ( • 2)

By formula: (Co⁺ • H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 2H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	75. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=71.1 kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=103. J/mol*K
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	103.	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=71.1 kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=103. J/mol*K

( • 2 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 3)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 2H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 3H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	44. ± 2.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=40. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=85.8 J/mol*K
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	85.8	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=40. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=85.8 J/mol*K

( • 3 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 4)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 3H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 4H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	44. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=40. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=105. J/mol*K
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	101.	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=40. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=105. J/mol*K

( • 4 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 5)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 4H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 5H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	22. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=18. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=91.6 J/mol*K
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	94.1	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=18. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=91.6 J/mol*K

( • 5 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 6)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 5H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 6H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	20. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=17. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=99.6 J/mol*K
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	99.2	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=17. kJ/mol, Δ_rS(300 K)=99.6 J/mol*K

( • 6 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 7)

By formula: (Co⁺ • 6H₂) + H₂ = (Co⁺ • 7H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	6. ± 3.	kJ/mol	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=3. kJ/mol; Δ_rS(300 K)=75.3 J/mol*K
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	75.3	J/mol*K	SIDT	Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993	gas phase; Δ_rH(0 K)=3. kJ/mol; Δ_rS(300 K)=75.3 J/mol*K

+ Hydrogen = ( • )

By formula: Fe⁺ + H₂ = (Fe⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	52.3 ± 0.8	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 45.2 kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	90.0	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 45.2 kJ/mol

( • Hydrogen ) + = ( • 2)

By formula: (Fe⁺ • H₂) + H₂ = (Fe⁺ • 2H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	71.1 ± 0.8	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 65.7 kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	105.	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 65.7 kJ/mol

( • 2 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 3)

By formula: (Fe⁺ • 2H₂) + H₂ = (Fe⁺ • 3H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	35. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 31. kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	79.9	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 31. kJ/mol

( • 3 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 4)

By formula: (Fe⁺ • 3H₂) + H₂ = (Fe⁺ • 4H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	41. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 36. kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	104.	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 36. kJ/mol

( • 4 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 5)

By formula: (Fe⁺ • 4H₂) + H₂ = (Fe⁺ • 5H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	11. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 9.2 kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	74.9	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 9.2 kJ/mol

( • 5 Hydrogen ) + = ( • 6)

By formula: (Fe⁺ • 5H₂) + H₂ = (Fe⁺ • 6H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	11. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 9.6 kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	75.7	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 9.6 kJ/mol

HN₂⁺ + Hydrogen = (HN₂⁺ • )

By formula: HN₂⁺ + H₂ = (HN₂⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	30.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Saluja, et al., 1979	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	94.6	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Saluja, et al., 1979	gas phase

(HN₂⁺ • Hydrogen ) + = (HN₂⁺ • 2)

By formula: (HN₂⁺ • H₂) + H₂ = (HN₂⁺ • 2H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	7.5	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Saluja, et al., 1979	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	71.	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Saluja, et al., 1979	gas phase

+ Hydrogen = ( • )

By formula: HO^- + H₂ = (HO^- • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	30.	kJ/mol	CID	Paulson and Henchman, 1984	gas phase; approximate value

HO₂⁺ + Hydrogen = (HO₂⁺ • )

By formula: HO₂⁺ + H₂ = (HO₂⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	52.3	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Saluja, et al., 1979	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	92.	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Saluja, et al., 1979	gas phase

(HO₂⁺ • ) + Hydrogen = (HO₂⁺ • • )

By formula: (HO₂⁺ • O₂) + H₂ = (HO₂⁺ • H₂ • O₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	17.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Saluja, et al., 1979	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	71.	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, Saluja, et al., 1979	gas phase

H₃⁺ + Hydrogen = (H₃⁺ • )

By formula: H₃⁺ + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	29. ± 2.	kJ/mol	AVG	N/A	Average of 4 out of 11 values; Individual data points
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	72.8 to 72.8	J/mol*K	RNG	N/A	Range of 6 values; Individual data points

(H₃⁺ • Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 2)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 2H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	14. ± 0.8	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Δ_rH°	13.	kJ/mol	HPMS	Beuhler, Ehrenson, et al., 1983	gas phase
Δ_rH°	14.	kJ/mol	HPMS	Beuhler, Ehrenson, et al., 1983	gas phase; deuterated
Δ_rH°	17.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase
Δ_rH°	7.5	kJ/mol	HPMS	Bennett and Field, 1972	gas phase; Entropy change is questionable
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	72.8	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Δ_rS°	70.7	J/mol*K	HPMS	Beuhler, Ehrenson, et al., 1983	gas phase
Δ_rS°	67.4	J/mol*K	HPMS	Beuhler, Ehrenson, et al., 1983	gas phase; deuterated
Δ_rS°	82.8	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase
Δ_rS°	45.2	J/mol*K	HPMS	Bennett and Field, 1972	gas phase; Entropy change is questionable

(H₃⁺ • 2 Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 3)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • 2H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 3H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	13. ± 0.4	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Δ_rH°	16.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	77.4	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Δ_rS°	84.5	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase

(H₃⁺ • 3 Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 4)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • 3H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 4H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	7.2 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Δ_rH°	10.	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	74.9	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Δ_rS°	80.8	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975	gas phase

(H₃⁺ • 4 Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 5)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • 4H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 5H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	6.9 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	79.1	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase

(H₃⁺ • 5 Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 6)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • 5H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 6H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	6.4 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	83.7	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase

(H₃⁺ • 6 Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 7)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • 6H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 7H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	3.7 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	69.0	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase

(H₃⁺ • 7 Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 8)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • 7H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 8H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	3.3 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	74.9	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase

(H₃⁺ • 8 Hydrogen ) + = (H₃⁺ • 9)

By formula: (H₃⁺ • 8H₂) + H₂ = (H₃⁺ • 9H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	2.6 ± 0.4	kJ/mol	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	79.9	J/mol*K	PHPMS	Hiraoka, 1987	gas phase

+ Hydrogen = ( • )

By formula: H₃O⁺ + H₂ = (H₃O⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	15. ± 2.	kJ/mol	SCATTERING	Okumura, Yeh, et al., 1990	gas phase

+ Hydrogen = ( • )

By formula: K⁺ + H₂ = (K⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	7.78	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1994	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 6.07 kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	56.5	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1994	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 6.07 kJ/mol

( • Hydrogen ) + = ( • 2)

By formula: (K⁺ • H₂) + H₂ = (K⁺ • 2H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	6.15	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1994	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 5.65 kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	46.9	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1994	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 5.65 kJ/mol

+ Hydrogen = ( • )

By formula: Li⁺ + H₂ = (Li⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	27. ± 19.	kJ/mol	EI	Wu, 1979	gas phase

+ Hydrogen = ( • )

By formula: Na⁺ + H₂ = (Na⁺ • H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	12.3	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1994	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 10.3 kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	55.2	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1994	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 10.3 kJ/mol

( • Hydrogen ) + = ( • 2)

By formula: (Na⁺ • H₂) + H₂ = (Na⁺ • 2H₂)

Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rH°	10.1	kJ/mol	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1994	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 9.41 kJ/mol
Quantity	Value	Units	Method	Reference	Comment
Δ_rS°	51.9	J/mol*K	SIDT	Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1994	gas phase; Δ_rH(0K) = 9.41 kJ/mol

Constants of diatomic molecules

Go To: Top, Gas phase thermochemistry data, Phase change data, Reaction thermochemistry data, Henry's Law data, Gas phase ion energetics data, Ion clustering data, References, Notes

Data compiled by: Klaus P. Huber and Gerhard H. Herzberg

Data collected through November, 1976

Symbols used in the table of constants
Symbol	Meaning
State	electronic state and / or symmetry symbol
T_e	minimum electronic energy (cm^-1)
ω_e	vibrational constant – first term (cm^-1)
ω_ex_e	vibrational constant – second term (cm^-1)
ω_ey_e	vibrational constant – third term (cm^-1)
B_e	rotational constant in equilibrium position (cm^-1)
α_e	rotational constant – first term (cm^-1)
γ_e	rotation-vibration interaction constant (cm^-1)
D_e	centrifugal distortion constant (cm^-1)
β_e	rotational constant – first term, centrifugal force (cm^-1)
r_e	internuclear distance (Å)
Trans.	observed transition(s) corresponding to electronic state
ν₀₀	position of 0-0 band (units noted in table)

Diatomic constants for H₂
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
WAVELENGTH TABLES of the H₂ spectrum from 2800 to 29000 Å with assignments of many of the lines Crosswhite, 1972. The TABLES OF ENERGY LEVELS Dieke, 1958 are also very useful as long as it is realized that the absolute values of the energy levels (n≥2) relative to the ground state need correction. Graphs and tables of POTENTIAL ENERGY CURVES for all known states of H₂, H₂⁺, and H₂^- Sharp, 1971.See note 1
Fragments of three other triplet systems. 2
u ³Π_u 6pπ	[123488.₀] 3				[29.3]			[0.023]		[1.06₉]	u → a	26232.3 4
u ³Π_u 6pπ	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
t ³Σ_u⁺ 5fσ	(121292) 5	(2661.4)	(121.9)		6						t → a	(25342)
t ³Σ_u⁺ 5fσ	↳Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934
q (³Σ_g⁺) 5dσ	(121295) 5	[2172.6]			6						q → c	(25325) 4
q (³Σ_g⁺) 5dσ	↳Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 2
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
n ³Π_u 5pπ	120952.₉	2321.4	62.8₆		29.9₅	1.24 7		[0.023]		1.057	n → a	24847.3 4
n ³Π_u 5pπ	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
m ³Σ_u⁺ 4fσ	(119317) 8	[2457.1]			6						m → a	23295.1 9
m ³Σ_u⁺ 4fσ	↳Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934
s ³Δ_g 4dδ	118875.₂	2291.7 10	62.4₄ 10		11						s → c	22949.3 12
s ³Δ_g 4dδ	↳Richardson, 1934; Foster and Richardson, 1953; Dieke, 1958
r ³Π_g 4dπ	118613.₇	2280.3 13	57.9₆ 13		11						r → c	22683.2 13
r ³Π_g 4dπ	↳Richardson, 1934; Foster and Richardson, 1953; Dieke, 1958
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
p ³Σ_g⁺ 4dσ	118509.₈	2303.1	76.9₀		6						p-k 14
	↳Miller and Freund, 1975
											p → c	22586.0 4
	↳Richardson, 1934; Foster and Richardson, 1953; Dieke, 1958
v (³Π_g)	(118330) 15	2340	(57)		[(29.1)]					[(1.07₂)]	v → c	(22430)
v (³Π_g)	↳Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 2
k ³Π_u 4pπ	118366.₂ 16	2344.37	67.2₉ 17	0.99	30.07₄	1.46₂ 18		[0.018₅]		1.054₇	k → a	22271.0 4
k ³Π_u 4pπ	↳Richardson, 1934; Cunningham and Dieke, 1950; Dieke, 1958
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
f ³Σ_u⁺ 4pσ	(116705)	[2143.6] 19			[27.0] 19					[1.11]	f → a	20526.0 19
f ³Σ_u⁺ 4pσ	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
o ³Σ_u⁺	(114234) 20	2399.1	91.0		[35]					[0.98]	o → a	(18160)
o ³Σ_u⁺	↳Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934
l ³Π_u	113825 21	2596.8	106.0		[36]					[0.96]	l → a	17846 4
l ³Π_u	↳Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934
j ³Δ_g 3dδ	(113533)	2345.2₆ 22	66.5₆	0.745	30.08₅ 22	1.69₂		0.019₀		1.0545	j ↔ c 23 R	17633.0 24
j ³Δ_g 3dδ	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
i ³Π_g 3dπ	(113132)	2253.5₅ 22	67.0₅ 25		29.22₁ 22	1.50₆		0.017₆		1.0700	i-d 26
	↳Freund and Miller, 1974
											i → e R	5384.81 27
	↳Gloersen and Dieke, 1965
											i ↔ c 23 R	17185.8 24
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
h ³Σ_g⁺ 3sσ	(112913)	[2268.7₃] 28			[30.6₂] 28					1.045 1	h → c	16990.8 29
h ³Σ_g⁺ 3sσ	↳Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 3; Dieke, 1958
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
g ³Σ_g⁺ 3dσ	112854.₄	2290.8₆	105.4₃ 30	2.403	31						g → e R	5116.6
	↳Gloersen and Dieke, 1965
											g ↔ c 23	16917.6 29
	↳Richardson, 1934; Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 3; Dieke, 1958
d ³Π_u 3pπ	112700.₃ 32	2371.58 33	66.27	0.88	30.364 33 34	1.545		[1.91]		1.0496	d → a 35 R	16619.0 29
d ³Π_u 3pπ	↳Dieke and Blue, 1935; Dieke, 1958
e ³Σ_u⁺ 3pσ	107774.₇	2196.13	65.80	-0.433	27.30	1.515				1.107	e → a R	11605.6
e ³Σ_u⁺ 3pσ	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1935
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
a ³Σ_g⁺ 2sσ	95936.₁ 36	2664.83	71.65 37	0.92	34.216	1.671		[0.0216]		0.9887₉	a → b 38 39
a ³Σ_g⁺ 2sσ											(a-X)	95076.4 36
c ³Π_u 3pπ	95838.₅ 40	2466.8₉	63.51	0.552	31.07 41 42	1.42₅		[0.019₅]		1.037₆	(c-X)	94881.₀ 43
b ³Σ_u⁺²pσ	Unstable; lower state of the continuous spectrum of H₂ (a → b). Pot. function Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1965.
Several excited states above the ionization limit, established by electron impact studies and leading to two exited atoms or H + H⁺.
Continuous absorption above ~130000 cm^-1. 44
v'=0 Rydberg series of rotational levels observed in low temperature absorption from X ¹Σ_g⁺, v"=0, J"=0 and 1 and converging to:
Rydberg	N=2 of H₂⁺: J=1 levels of npπ ¹Π_u⁺ (n=6,...,32, joining on to C, D, D', D")45; ν = 124591.5 46 - R/(n + 0.082)². Similar series with v'=1,...,6 47. R(0) lines (para H₂)
	↳Herzberg, 1969; Takezawa, 1970, 2; missing citation
	N=1 of H₂⁺: J=1 levels of npπ ¹Π_u^- (n=6,...,43, joining on to C, D, D', D")48; ν = 124476.0 46 - R/(n + 0.082)². Similar series with v'=1,...,5. Q(1) lines (ortho H₂)
	↳Herzberg, 1969; Takezawa, 1970, 2; missing citation
	N=1 of H₂⁺: J=0 levels of npσ ¹Σ_u⁺ (n=5,...,19, joining on to B, B', B")48; ν = 124476.0 46 - R/(n + 0.203)². Similar series with v'=1,2,3. P(1) lines (ortho H₂)
	↳Takezawa, 1970, 2; missing citation
	N=0 of H₂⁺: J=1 levels of npσ ¹Σ_u⁺ (n=5,...,40, joining on to B, B', B")45; ν = 124417.0 46 - R/(n + 0.203)². Similar series with v'=1,...,6. 5 R(0) lines (para H₂)
	↳Herzberg, 1969; Takezawa, 1970, 2; missing citation
B bar ¹Σ_u⁺	State causing ion-pair formation after excitation of higher Rydberg states; also responsible for perturbations in B' ¹Σ_u⁺. Correlates at small r with B" ¹Σ_u⁺, forming a double-minimum state.
B bar ¹Σ_u⁺	↳Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974; Chupka, Dehmer, et al., 1975; Kolos, 1976
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
D" ¹Π_u 5pπ	121211.0 49	2319.92 49	63.041		30.7₆ 50 51	1.45 50		(0.03)		1.043	D" ← X R	120176.0 49
D" ¹Π_u 5pπ	↳Monfils, 1965; Monfils, 1968
D' ¹Π_u 4pπ	118865.3 49	2329.97 49	63.140		29.8₉ 52 51	1.11 52	-0.53	[0.025] 52		[(1.058)]	D' ← X R	117835.2 49
D' ¹Π_u 4pπ	↳Namioka, 1964; Monfils, 1965; Monfils, 1968
S ¹Δ_g 4dδ	[119893] 53 3				[(28.8)] 54					[(1.07₈)]	S → B V	27510
S ¹Δ_g 4dδ	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
O ¹Σ⁺ 4sσ	[(119870)] 55 3				[(32)]					[(1.0₂)]	O → B V	(27487) 56
O ¹Σ⁺ 4sσ	↳Richardson, 1934
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
R ¹Π_g 4dπ	(118688) 57	[2142] 58			[(30)] 54					[(1.0₆)]	(R → C)	(18488)
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
											R → B V	27376 45
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
P ¹Σ_g⁺ 4dσ	[119531] 59 3				[(30)] 54					[(1.0₆)]	(P → C)	18260 49
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
											P → B V	27148 60
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
T ¹Σ⁺	[119512.6] 61 3				[(25.4)]					[(1.14₈)]	T → B V	27130.1
T ¹Σ⁺	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
B" ¹Σ_u⁺ 4pσ	117984.5	2197.5	68.136		26.68 62 63	1.19 62		[0.034]		[(1.119₈)]	B" ← X R	116886.9 64
B" ¹Σ_u⁺ 4pσ	↳missing citation; Monfils, 1965; Monfils, 1968; missing citation
N ¹Σ_g⁺	(116287) 65	[1983.3]			[(18.4)]					[(1.35)]	N → B R	24896.4
N ¹Σ_g⁺	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
U (¹Σ_g⁺)	[116707.7] 65 66				[(18.8)]					[(1.33)]	U → B 67 R	24325.1
U (¹Σ_g⁺)	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
M ¹Σ_g⁺	(114485) 65	[2176.0]			[(13)]					[(1.6₀)]	M → B R	23190.0 68
M ¹Σ_g⁺	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
L ¹Σ_g⁺	(114520) 65	[(1835)]			[(9.7)]					[(1.8₆)]	L → B R	23054.8
L ¹Σ_g⁺	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
H ¹Σ_g⁺ 3sσ	113899 69	2538	124		[(29.5)]					[(1.06₅)]	H → C R	13866.6
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
											H → B V	22754.1 70
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
D ¹Π_u 3pπ	113888.7	2359.91	68.81₆ 71		30.29₆ 72 73 63	1.42 72		0.0201 74		1.0508	D → E R	13709.₇
	↳Richardson, 1937; Dieke, 1958
											D ↔ X 75 R	112872.3 76
	↳missing citation; Monfils, 1965; Monfils, 1968; missing citation
J ¹Δ_g 3dδ	(113550)	2341.1₅ 77	63.2₃ 77		30.08₁ 77	1.71₈ 77		0.018₉ 77		1.0546	J → C 78 R	13435.6 79
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
											J → B 78 V	22322.5 79
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
I ¹Π_g 3dπ	(113142) 80	2259.1₅ 77	78.4₁ 77 80		29.25₉ 77 81	1.58₄ 77		0.018₀ 77		1.0693	I → C 81 R	12982.5 82
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke and Lewis, 1937; Dieke, 1958
											I → B V	21869.5 82
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke and Lewis, 1937; Dieke, 1958
G ¹Σ_g⁺ 3dσ	112834 83	2343.9	55.9 84		[(28.4)] 85					[(1.08₅)]	G → C 86 85 R	12722.2 87
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
											G → B 86 V	21609.2 87
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
K (¹Σ_g⁺)	(112669) 88	[2232.59]	30		[10.8]					[1.76]	K → C R	12538.6
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
											K → B R	21425.4
	↳Richardson, 1934; Dieke, 1958
Q (¹Π_g)	(113163) 89	[742]			[(16.3)]					1.43	Q → B R	21151.₁
Q (¹Π_g)	↳Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934; Dieke, 1958
B' ¹Σ_u⁺ 3pσ	111642.₈ 90	2039.52	83.406 91		26.70₅ 92	2.781 93		[0.012] 94		1.119₂	B' → E,F 95	11311.5 96
	↳Porto and Jannuzzi, 1963
											B' ← X 97 R	110478.2
	↳Namioka, 1964; Namioka, 1965; Monfils, 1965
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
F ¹Σ_g⁺ 2pσ²	100911 98 99	[1199] 98		100			101				F → B 102 R 103
F ¹Σ_g⁺ 2pσ²	↳Dieke, 1949; Porto and Jannuzzi, 1963
E ¹Σ_g⁺ 2sσ	100082.3 98 104	2588.9 104	130.5 104		32.68 104	1.818 104		[0.0228] 104		1.011₈	E → B 102 V	8961.23
E ¹Σ_g⁺ 2sσ	↳Dieke, 1936; Porto and Dieke, 1955; Dieke, 1958; Porto and Jannuzzi, 1963
C ¹Π_u 2pπ	100089.8 95	2443.77	69.524 105 106		31.362₉ 106	1.664₇ 107		0.0223	-0.0007₄	1.0327₉	C ↔ X 108 109 R	99120.1₇ 95
C ¹Π_u 2pπ	↳Dieke, 1938; Namioka, 1964, 2; Namioka, 1965; Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974
B ¹Σ_u⁺ 2pσ	91700.0 110	1358.09	20.888 111		20.015₄ 112	1.1845 113		0.01625 114		1.2928₂	B ↔ X 115 116 117 R	90203.3₅
B ¹Σ_u⁺ 2pσ	↳Herzberg and Howe, 1959; Wilkinson, 1968; Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974
State	T_e	ω_e	ω_ex_e	ω_ey_e	B_e	α_e	γ_e	D_e	β_e	r_e	Trans.	ν₀₀
X ¹Σ_g1sσ²	0	4401.21₃	121.33₆ 118		60.853₀ 119	3.062₂ 120		0.0471 121		0.74144 122
	↳Herzberg, 1950; Fink, Wiggins, et al., 1965; Terhune and Peters, 1959; Foltz, Rank, et al., 1966; Brannon, Church, et al., 1968
	Raman sp. 123
	↳Stoicheff, 1957; Foltz, Rank, et al., 1966
	Rotational 124 and nuclear rf magn. Reson.
	↳Harrick and Ramsey, 1952; Barnes, Bray, et al., 1954; Kolsky, Phipps, et al., 1952; Harrick, Barnes, et al., 1953

Notes

The T_e values for the upper states of the triplet transitions are based on T_e" for the lower state (a or c) and have been calculated assuming Y'₀₀ ~ Y"₀₀.

³B→c, ³C→c, 7pπ→a Richardson, 1934, Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 2.

Only v=0 observed.

Referred to the (non-existent) N=0 level in ³Π states; the N=1 levels of c ³Π (+ and -) lie 60.7 cm^-1 above N=0.

t and q are designated ³F and ³G, respectively, in Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 2, Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934.

The states g ³Σ_g⁺(3dσ), p ³Σ_g⁺(4dσ), q ³Σ_g⁺(5dσ), m ³Σ_u⁺(4fσ) and t ³Σ_u⁺(5fσ) are strongly affected by l-uncoupling. The N=1 levels lie below N=0 for v=0 and 1; meaningful B values cannot be given until the whole d and f complexes have been fully analyzed, see Ginter, 1967.

Represents B₀ and B₁ of ³Π^- only; B₂ = 26.26 Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, B₃ = 24.54 Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934.

³E of Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934.

Refers to N'=0 which lies above N'=4 because of strong l-uncoupling.

Constants refer to N=2; from v= 0,1,2.

Because of strong l-uncoupling no meaningful B values can be given; see 6.

Refers to the N=2 level of s ³Δ_g^- above the hypothetical level N=0 of c ³Π_u; see 4.

The constants refer to N=1 of r ³Π_g^-; ν₀₀ is the energy above the hypothetical level N=0 of c(v=0), see 4.

Anticrossings and microwave transitions. The energy difference between k ³Π_u(v=1,N=3) and p ³Σ_g⁺(v=1,N=5) is +0.2785 cm^-1. Fine structure parameters.

³A of Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 2; probably a doubly excited state. The possibility (1sσ)(4fπ) mentioned by Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 2 and quoted in MOLSPEC 1 can be ruled out since it does not give rise to an even state.

A₀(ortho)= -0.00937 Freund, Miller, et al., 1973, Miller, Freund, et al., 1974, Miller and Freund, 1975, A₀(para)= -0.0071₀ cm^-1 Freund, Miller, et al., 1973, Miller, Freund, et al., 1974, Miller and Freund, 1975; also hyperfine structure investigated by these authors.

ω_ey_e= +0.99 Cunningham and Dieke, 1950.

From B₀ and B₁ of Π^- only Richardson, 1934.

Calculated from the data in Richardson, 1934 and Dieke, 1958. ΔG(1/2) and ν₀₀ refer to actual N=0 level which is strongly perturbed.

³D of Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934. Probably a doubly excited state: (2pσ)(3dσ).

³Y of Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934. Probably a doubly excited state: (2pσ)(3dπ).

These constants [from Ginter, 1967] refer to the ³Π^- and ³Δ^- components and are based on "Approximation 2" of Ginter, 1966 for the evaluation of the l-uncoupling. The observed levels are given by Dieke, 1958.

Observed in absorption in flash discharges Herzberg, 1967.

Lower component of N'=l (i ³Π) or 2 (J ³Δ) relative to the (non-existent) N"=0 level of c ³Π.

Ab initio calculations Browne, 1965, Wright and Davidson, 1965 give a pronounced potential maximum near 2.5 Å for this state.

Anticrossings and microwave transitions; i ³Π_g(v=3,N=2) is 1.9244 cm^-1 above d ³Π_g(v=3,N=1).

Refers to Π^-(N=1). Π⁺(N=1) is at 5471.70 cm^-1 above e ³Σ_u⁺(v=0,N=0). The rotational levels are very irregular, only partly on account of l-uncoupling.

From Dieke, 1958. ω_e = 2395.2 Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 3, ω_ex_e = 64.2 Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 3, B₀ = 30.0 Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 3. According to Dieke, 1958 the v=0 levels may be spurious. If so, only v=1 remains with B₁ = 28.7₂.

Referred to the (non-existent) N=0 level in ³Π states; the N=1 levels of c ³Π (+ and -) lie 60.7 cm^-1 above N=0.

Calculated from the N=0 levels of Dieke, 1958.

The states g ³Σ_g⁺ (3dσ), p ³Σ_g⁺ (4dσ), q ³Σ_g⁺ (5dσ), m ³Σ_u⁺ (4fσ) and t ³Σ_u⁺ (5fσ) are strongly affected by l-uncoupling. The N=1 levels lie below N=0 for v=0 and 1; meaningful B values cannot be given until the whole d and f complexes have been fully analyzed, see Ginter, 1967.

The fine structure in the N=1 levels of both ortho- and para-H₂ has been observed in microwave-optical double resonance by Freund and Miller, 1973 who give A_e = 0.0281 Freund and Miller, 1973 as well as spin-spin coupling constants. For para-H₂, v=0, N=1, the three component levels J=1,2, and 0 are at -0.01241, -0.00695, and +0.07197 cm^-1, respectively. For ortho-H₂ the hyperfine structure has also been studied.

Constants refer to ³Π^-. ³Π⁺ is strongly perturbed, i.e. the Λ - type doubling is fairly large and irregular Dieke, 1935, 2.

Breaking-off of P and R branches (³Π⁺) above v'=3 on account of predissociation. Breaking-off of Q branches (³Π^-) for v'=7,8 above N=1 on account of preionization Beutler and Junger, 1936, 2.

Lifetime τ=63 ns Cahill, 1969; see, however, Marechal, Jost, et al., 1972 who give τ= 31 ns Marechal, Jost, et al., 1972.

The T₀(ν₀₀) value is derived from singlet-triplet anti-crossings in a magnetic field Miller and Freund, 1974, Jost and Lombardi, 1974 and corresponds to v=0, N=0. It agrees fairly well with 95073.₂ obtained from the energy of a ³Σ_u⁺(v=0,N=0) below the ionization limit, 29344 ± 2 cm^-1 Beutler and Junger, 1936, 2, combined with the new value of I.P.(H₂). Dieke, 1958 gives T₀ = 95226 without explanation; the most recent theoretical value is T₀= 95077.3 Kolos, 1975. The T_e value in the table takes account of Y₀₀ in both upper (Y'₀₀= 4.9₂) and lower state.

ω_ey_e= +0.92. Precise ab initio potential function (including diagonal corrections) and predicted vibrational levels in Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1968. Except for a constant shift, the latter agree well with the observed levels Dieke, 1958.

Lifetime τ(v=0,1) = 10.4₅ ns Smith and Chevalier, 1972, King, Read, et al., 1975.

Reproduction in MOLSPEC 1, Fig.l2.

A = -0.1249 cm^-1 Jette, 1974, Jette and Miller, 1974. T_e takes account of Y₀₀ in both upper (Y'₀₀= 4.1₈) and lower state.

The Λ-type doubling is quite small (~ 0.5 cm^-1 for N=6); the constants refer to the average. The triplet splitting in N=2 of para-H₂ has been fully resolved in molecular beam experiments of Lichten, 1960 yielding Δν(J=2-1) = 0.16438 Lichten, 1960, Δν(J=2-3) = 0.19674 cm^-1 Lichten, 1960 with J=2 at the top. The hyperfine structure in N=1,J=2 of ortho-H₂ is Δν(F=3-2) = 0.0236 Frey and Mizushima, 1962, Δν(F=2-1) = 0.0154 cm^-1 Frey and Mizushima, 1962 as quoted by Frey and Mizushima, 1962. Foster and Richardson, 1953 give spin splittings for N = 1,2,3,4,5 without resolving J=N+l from J=N-1.

The levels of c ³Π_u⁺ are strongly predissociated by the b ³Σ_u⁺ state Herzberg, 1967; the levels of c ³Π_u^- are either very weakly affected by a forbidden predissociation to b ³Σ_u⁺ Lichten, 1962, Chiu, 1964 or decay radiatively (by magnetic dipole radiation) to the b ³Σ_u⁺ state as suggested by the lifetime measurements of Johnson, 1972, τ(v=0)= 1.02 ms Johnson, 1972 independent of spin component and isotope. Johnson, 1974 observed quenching of c ³Π_u^- in an electric field. The Stark effect is large (~ E+4 times greater than for the ground state) and has been studied experimentally by Kagann and English, 1976 and compared with the theoretical values of English and Albritton, 1975.

This number, obtained from ν₀₀(a-X) + ν₀₀(e-a) + ν₀₀(g-e) - ν₀₀(g-c), is 87 cm^-1 higher than given in MOLSPEC 1, a change made necessary by the work of Gloersen and Dieke, 1965. See also 36.

Theoretical and experimental values for the ionization probability into the various vibrational levels of H₂⁺ are given by Dunn, 1966, Villarejo, 1968, 2, Nicholls, 1968, Ford, Docken, et al., 1975 and Villarejo, 1968, Turner, 1968, respectively. The ionization cross section near the ionization limit has been studied at high resolution by Chupka and Berkowitz, 1968, Comes and Wellern, 1968. See also Backx, Wight, et al., 1976.

For high n there is strong l-uncoupling and the two series of ¹Σ_u⁺ and ¹Π_u⁺ levels of para-H₂ should be called np0 and np2, respectively, corresponding to the fact that the first converges to N=0, the second to N=2 of H₂⁺ There are strong systematic perturbations between the J=1 levels of these two series (because of l- uncoupling) so that the formulae as given do not represent the series very well. An accurate representation can be obtained by Fano's quantum defect theory; see Herzberg and Jungen, 1972. Levels of npπ, ¹Π_u⁺ above N=0 of H₂⁺ are preionized resulting in asymmetrically broadened absorption lines with apparent emission wings.

Limits of Rydberg series above v"=0, J"=0.

Chupka, Dehmer, et al., 1975 have observed Rydberg levels with v = 9,10,11 in the study of ion-pair formation.

These two series of ortho levels are essentially unperturbed.

Average of Π⁺ and Π^-. ν₀₀ referred to (N'=0).

Refers to Π^-; Π⁺ is perturbed; B₀(Π⁺) = 30.178, B₁(Π⁺) = 31.370.

RKR potential function in Monfils, 1968, 2.

Refers to Π^-; γ_e = -0.53. Π⁺ is perturbed, B₀(Π⁺) = 31.09₅, B₁(Π⁺) = 29.165.

4F of Dieke, 1958, 4¹χ of Richardson, 1934.

The states P,R,S form a d complex with strong uncoupling. As a result the constants given have only limited meaning.

4¹O of Richardson, 1934, not given by Dieke, 1958.

From R(0) and P(1) according to the data of Richardson, 1934.

4¹B of Richardson, 1934, 4E of Dieke, 1958.

Refers to ¹Π^-.

4¹C of Richardson, 1934, 4D of Dieke, 1958.

The J=1 level is observed at 27207.62 cm^-1 above J=0, v=0 of B ¹Σ_u⁺. The value given for J=0 is extrapolated and, because of the uncoupling, is rather uncertain.

4¹K of Richardson, 1934, doubly excited state.

Representing only B₀ and B₁. The B_v curve has a positive curvature for low v and a strong negative curvature for high v. B_v = 27.1₃ - 2.35(v+1/2) + 0.665(v+1/2)² - 0.0729(v+1/2)³ Monfils, 1965.

RKR potential function Monfils, 1968, 2. Ab initio potential function Kolos, 1976.

Deperturbed value from Namioka, 1964. The observed value for J=0 [perturbed by B'(v=4)] is 116885.6 according to Namioka, 1964 and 116885.3 according to Monfils, 1965, while in the more recent paper Monfils, 1968 gives 116882.00.

All these states are considered as doubly excited states by Dieke, 1958. They may well form one or two double-minimum states (similar to E, F) together with H ¹Σ_g⁺.

Only v=0.

This is the λ4142.8 progression of Richardson, 1934 as revised by Dieke, 1958.

These values agree with Dieke, 1958; Richardson, 1934 gives 23057.22 and 23191.66 for L and M, respectively.

3¹0 of Richardson, 1934.

From R(0) of the 0-0 band and F(1)-F(0) as given by Richardson, 1934. The basis for 22751.6 in Richardson, 1934 is not clear.

ω_ex_e= +1.027₄(v+1/2)³ - 0.0420₂(v+1/2)⁴; the vibrational constants Monfils, 1968 refer to the average of Π⁺ and Π^-. See also 73.

The rotational constants Namioka, 1964 represent only the levels v= 0, 1, 2 of Π^-. The Π⁺ levels are strongly perturbed by the B' state which also causes the predissociation of ¹Π⁺ for v'≥ 3; see 73. Monfils, 1965 gives for the deperturbed values: B_v(Π⁺)= 32.5₁- 2.00(v+1/2) + 0.071(v+1/2)² - 0.0040(v+1/2)³ ; B_v(Π^-)= 30.8₁ - 1.96(v+1/2) + 0.102(v+1/2)² - 0.0053(v+1/2)³ .

Strong predissociation for v'≥3; no bands with v'≥3 have ever been observed in emission. In absorption strongly broadened lines with apparent emission wings (Beutler- Fano shapes) in D ¹Π_u^- ← X ¹Σ_g^- Herzberg, 1971; line widths of 4 and 11.5 cm^-1 for J=1 and 2, respectively, have been observed Comes and Schumpe, 1971 and accounted for by interaction with the continuum of B' ¹Σ_u^- Fiquet-Fayard and Gallais, 1971, Julienne, 1971, Fiquet-Fayard and Gallais, 1972. Widths for D ¹Π_u^- ← X ¹Σ_g^- (Q) lines are much smaller. Lyα fluorescence as a result of predissociation Comes and Wellern, 1968, Comes and Wenning, 1969, Mentall and Gentieu, 1970. Electric field induced component of predissociation Comes and Wenning, 1970.

From Namioka, 1964; Monfils, 1965 gives D_v(Π⁺) = 0.033+0.0010(v+1/2) Monfils, 1965, D_v(Π^-) =0.0283 - 0.0012(v+1/2) Monfils, 1965.

RKR Franck-Condon factors Spindler, 1969. Absorption coefficients of D←X bands Cook and Metzger, 1964. 0scillator strengths f₀₀ = 0.0061₄ Lewis, 1974, f₂₀ = 0.010₉ Lewis, 1974.

Average of Π⁺ and Π^- extrapolated to J=0. The Λ-type doubling for v=0, J=1 is 4.2 cm^-1 with Π⁺ above Π^-.

These constants Ginter, 1967 refer to Π^- and Δ^- and take into account the effects of l- uncoupling in the d-complex according to the formulae of Ginter, 1966. They cannot be used to derive energy levels without the use of these formulae. The observed levels are given in Dieke, 1958.

The forbidden ¹Δ_g → ¹Σ_u^- transition occurs because of strong uncoupling in the upper state. Only Q branches are observed in these bands.

Refers to J=2 of Δ^- at 10.8 cm^-1 below J=2 of Δ⁺.

3¹B of Richardson, 1934, 3E of Dieke, 1958. Mulliken, 1964 and Browne, 1965 predict a fairly high (0.4 eV) maximum in the potential function of this state.

Zeeman effect studies Dieke, Cunningham, et al., 1953 yield g(v=0,J=1) = 0.49₈ Dieke, Cunningham, et al., 1953, g(v=0,J=2) = 0.412 Dieke, Cunningham, et al., 1953, etc.; lifetime τ(v=0,J=2) = 38 ns van der Linde and Dalby, 1972, see 85.

Referred to J'=1 of I ¹Π^-; J=1 of I ¹Π⁺ is 62.32 cm^-1 higher.

3¹C of Richardson, 1934, 3D of Dieke, 1958.

No levels higher than v=3 have been observed which suggests that the dissociation limit is 1²S + 2²S,²P at 118377.6 cm^-1. The constants represent only v=0,1,2.

This value Richardson, 1934 does not represent the low rotational levels because of l-uncoupling, e.g. the J=1 level is below J=0. The actual levels are given in Dieke, 1958. Hyperfine structure for v=1,J=1; A = 1.0 ± 0.17 MHz Melieres-Marechal and Lombardi, 1974. Large Zeeman splittings corresponding to the strong l-uncoupling Dieke, Cunningham, et al., 1953, g(v=0,J=1) = 0.901 Dieke, Cunningham, et al., 1953, g(v=0,J=2) = 0.571 Dieke, Cunningham, et al., 1953, etc.; see also Freund and Miller, 1972. Lifetimes from Hanle effect observations van der Linde and Dalby, 1972; τ(v=0,J=1) = 27 ns van der Linde and Dalby, 1972, τ(v=0,J=2,3) = 39 ns van der Linde and Dalby, 1972.

The G→B system gives rise to the strongest lines in the visible region.

Referred to J'=0 which, because of l-uncoupling, has an anomalous position.

3¹K of Richardson, 1934, probably due to (2sσ)².

Fragmentary, possibly (2pσ)(2pπ).

Takes account of Y₀₀ in both upper and lower state. Y'₀₀ = 15.3 cm^-1 is rather uncertain and depends strongly on the number of levels included. See 93.

ω_ex_e= +3.533(v+1/2)³ - 0.93750(v+1/2)⁴; these are the constants of Namioka, 1964 [except T_e which is taken from Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974], they apply only to v=0,...,4. Monfils, 1968 gives a very different set of constants based on seven levels v=0,...,6. The ΔG curve (in H₂, HD, and D₂) has a characteristic tail which makes representation of the higher vibrational levels by a conventional formula meaningless Namioka, 1964, Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974.

RKR potential functions Namioka, 1965, Monfils, 1968, 2. A very slight maximum of the potential function at 2.9 Angstroms has been predicted by Ford, Browne, et al., 1975 but not confirmed in the calculations of Kolos, 1976; see also Wolniewicz, 1975. The experimental data, while suggesting an anomalous form of the potential function, do not indicate a maximum Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974.

a_v= +0.540(v+1/2)² - 0.091₇(v+1/2)³; these constants Namioka, 1964 represent only the first five (deperturbed) B_v values. If only three levels are used B_v= 26.371- 1.9000(v+1/2)-0.0050(v+1/2)² leading to a very different Y₀₀ value (3.6) from the one used here (see 90).

The higher D_v values are quite irregular.

The T_e values for B and C include the effects of Y₀₀ on the zero point energies in both upper and lower states; Y'₀₀(B) = 8.7, Y'₀₀(C) = 5.0 cm^-1. On the other hand, the T_e value of C ¹Π_u and ν₀₀(C-X) exclude the term - BΛ² in the energy formula, a term that is usually included to form part of the effective potential energy. With this inclusion and disregarding Y₀₀ Namioka, 1965 gives T_e = 100063.42 and ν₀₀ = 99090.35 on the basis of older data for v=0...4 and his own precise data for v=5....13.

From the 0-1 band of Porto and Jannuzzi, 1963; from T₀(B')-T₀(E) one obtains 11313.6₂.

RKR Franck-Condon factors Spindler, 1969. Oscillator strengths f₁₀ = 0.0028 Lewis, 1974, f₃₀ = 0.0048 Lewis, 1974.

Because of strong interaction the two states E [2¹X of Richardson, 1934, 2A of Dieke, 1958] and F, in zero approximation lsσ2sσ and (2pσ)², form a single state with two minima as first recognized by Davidson, 1961. The most detailed calculation of the potential function and the energy levels is that of Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1969 whose numbering and ΔG(1/2) value for the F ¹Σ_g^- component has been adopted in the table. According to Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1969 ν₀₀(F-B) would be at 9146.8 cm^-1 but v=0,1,2,3 of F have not been observed. The observed v=4 level lies just below the potential maximum.

From the observed ν₄₀ and the energy of v=4 above the (outer) minimum as calculated by Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1969.

100

B₄ = 6.24 129

101

R₄=2.31₅ 129

102

Franck-Condon factors Lin, 1974. Electronic transition moment Wolniewicz, 1969.

103

ν₄₀ =13635.1

104

These numbers represent only the lower vibrational levels near the inner minimum. Owing to the interaction of E and F (see 98) higher ΔG(v+1/2), B_v, D_v values are irregular.

105

ω_ex_e= +0.73l2(v+1/2)³ - 0.04l5(v+1/2)⁴. These constants refer to the (unperturbed) Π^- component and are based on an 8-level fit to the data of Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974 [v=0-4] and Namioka, 1964, 2 [v=5-7]. Somewhat different constants are given by Namioka, 1965. Note, that the T_e values in Dieke, 1958 are too low by 8.4 cm^-1 Namioka, 1965. The constants of Monfils, 1968 are affected by not recognizing this error.

106

Theoretical work King and Van Vleck, 1939, Mulliken, 1960, Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1965, Rothenberg and Davidson, 1966, Kolos, 1967 has predicted, and the analysis of the spectrum Namioka, 1964, Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974 has confirmed, that the potential curve of C ¹Π_u has a van der Waals maximum of ~ 105 cm^-1 above the asymptote near r=4.8 Angstroms. ab initio potential function (without diagonal corrections) and predicted vibrational levels Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1968. RKR potential functions Namioka, 1965 Monfils, 1968, 2; see, however, Julienne, 1973.

107

α_v= +0.0296(v+1/2)² - 0.00296(v+1/2)³. These constants refer to the Π^- component (Π⁺ is strongly perturbed by B ¹Σ_u^-) and are from an 8-level least- squares fit of the data of Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974 [v = 0-4] and Namioka, 1964, 2 [v=5-7]. Somewhat discordant B_v values for both Π^- and Π⁺ (the latter after deperturbation) are given by Namioka, 1964, 2, Monfils, 1965, Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974. The Λ-type doubling for v=0, J-l is 1.17 cm^-1; for other v, J as well as theoretical values see Julienne, 1973, Ford, 1974.

108

Lifetime τ(v=0,1,2,3) = 0.6 ns Hesser, 1968.

109

RKR Franck-Condon factors calculated by missing citation,89 and "measured" by Geiger and Schmoranzer, 1969, Schmoranzer and Geiger, 1973, Fabian and Lewis, 1974 who have also determined the dependence of the transition moment on r. Ab initio calculation of the latter by Wolniewicz, 1969. Theoretical transition probabilities and f values Wolniewicz, 1969, Allison and Dalgarno, 1970, Allison and Dalgarno, 1970, 2, Dalgarno and Stephens, 1970, experimental values Hesser, 1968, Fabian and Lewis, 1974, Lewis, 1974: f₁₀ = 0.059, f₂₀ = 0.060, f₃₀ = 0.044,... Calculated transitions to the continuum of X ¹Σ_g^- Stephens and Dalgarno, 1972. Selective enhancements of v=0 and 2 of C ¹Π_u in Ar-H₂ mixtures have been studied by Takezawa, Innes, et al., 1966; similar enhancements have also been observed in Kr-H₂ mixtures. For stimulated emission in the Q(1) and P(3) lines of the 1-4, 2-5, 2-6, 3-7 Werner bands see Hodson and Dreyfus, 1972, Waynant, 1972.

110

The T_e values for B and C include the effects of Y₀₀ on the zero point energies in both upper and lower states; Y'₀₀(B) = 8.7, Y'₀₀(C) = 5.0 cm^-1. On the other hand, the T_e value of C ¹Π_u and ν₀₀(C-X) exclude the term - BΛ₂ in the energy formula, a term that is usually included to form part of the effective potential energy. With this inclusion and disregarding Y₀₀ Namioka, 1965 gives T_e = 100063.42 and ν₀₀ = 99090.35 on the basis of older data for v=0...4 and his own precise data for v=5....13.

111

ω_ex_e= +0.7196(v+1/2)³ - 0.0598(v+1/2)⁴ +0.002l6(v+1/2)⁵, Y₀₀ = 8.7; from a least squares fit Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974 to the first eight levels as given by Herzberg and Howe, 1959. Wilkinson, 1968 gives slightly different constants based on the first five levels only. Monfils, 1968 and Namioka, 1964, 2 have observed levels up to v= 35 and 37, respectively, very close to the dissociation limit at 118377.₆ cm^-1 Herzberg, 1970. The dissociation energy of the B ¹Σ_u^- state is 28174.2 cm^-1.

112

RKR potential functions Tobias and Vanderslice, 1961, Namioka, 1965,$ 72, Spindler, 1969; see also Stwalley, 1973. Precise ab initio potential function (including diagonal corrections) and predicted vibrational levels Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1968, Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1975.

113

α_v= +0.1214(v+1/2)² - 0.0117(v+1/2)³ + 0.0004₆(v+1/2)⁴, from a least squares fit Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974 to the first eight levels. Wilkinson, 1968 gives slightly different constants based on the first five levels only. For v≥8 there are strong rotational perturbations caused by interaction with C ¹Π_u. Only after deperturbation can meaningful B_v values for these levels be obtained [see Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974]. For a theoretical discussion of the intensities in the perturbed region see Ford, 1974.

114

D_v= -2.165E-3(v+1/2) + 2.28₉E-4(v+1/2)² - 1.18₅E-5(v+1/2)³. For individual B_v and D_v values see Herzberg and Howe, 1959, Namioka, 1964, 2, Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974.

115

Lifetime τ(v=3...7) = 0.8 ns Hesser, 1968; τ(v=8...11) = 1.0 ns Smith and Chevalier, 1972.

116

Franck-Condon factors from RKR potentials Halmann and Laulicht, 1966, Spindler, 1969; from ab initio potential functions Dalgarno and Allison, 1968, Allison and Dalgarno, 1970, Allison and Dalgarno, 1970, 2, including theoretical oscillator strengths; see also Lin, 1975. J dependence of Franck-Condon factors and transition probabilities Villarejo, Stockbauer, et al., 1969, Wolniewicz, 1969, Becker and Fink, 1971. Experimental Franck-Condon factors and oscillator strengths Geiger and Topschowsky, 1966, Haddad, Lokan, et al., 1968, Hesser, Brooks, et al., 1968, Geiger and Schmoranzer, 1969, Fabian and Lewis, 1974, Lewis, 1974, Schmoranzer, 1975; Σf_v'0 = 0.29. Variation of transition moment with r Hesser, Brooks, et al., 1968, Geiger and Schmoranzer, 1969, Schmoranzer, 1975 and, ab initio, Dalgarno and Allison, 1968, Wolniewicz, 1969. Selective enhancements of v=3 and 10 of B ¹Σ_u^- in an Ar-H₂ mixture, first observed by Lyman, have recently been studied by Takezawa, Innes, et al., 1966; similar enhancements were also observed in Kr-H₂ mixtures. Stimulated emission in the P branches of the 3-10, 4-11, 5-12, 6-13, 7-13 Lyman bands Hodgson, 1970, Waynant, Shipman, et al., 1970.

117

A continuous spectrum corresponding to transitions to the continuum of X ¹Σ_g^- has been observed Dalgarno, Herzberg, et al., 1970 and the intensity distribution found to be in agreement with calculations. Dalgarno and Stephens, 1970, Stephens and Dalgarno, 1972 have calculated transition probabilities and the fractions that go to the continuum for v' = 0.... 36. Allison and Dalgarno, 1969 calculated the continuous spectrum corresponding to absorption from the ground state to the continuum of B ¹σ_u^-.

118

ω_ex_e= +0.812₉(v+1/2)³; these constants Foltz, Rank, et al., 1966 represent only the levels v=0,1,2,3. Herzberg and Howe, 1959 has less accurate constants representing higher G(v) values. "True" ω_e= 4403.₂ Fink, Wiggins, et al., 1965 (including Dunham corrections) Fink, Wiggins, et al., 1965. The zero-point energy (Y₀₀ = 8.9₃ included) is 2179.2₇ cm^-1. Herzberg and Monfils, 1960.

119

RKR potential functions Tobias and Vanderslice, 1961, Weissman, Vanderslice, et al., 1963, Ginter and Battino, 1965, see also Zhirnov and Vasilevskii, 1970; ab initio potential functions Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1974, Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1975, 2. Rotational and vibrational levels calculated from the latter are given in Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1975, 2; see also Waech and Bernstein, 1967, Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1968, 2. Waech and Bernstein, 1967 include some of the quasi-bound levels above the dissociation limit [see also Allison, 1969]; for their experimental observation see Herzberg and Howe, 1959, Herzberg and Mckenzie, 1979. Recent comparisons between ab initio calculated and observed energy levels Bunker, 1972, Orlikowski and Wolniewicz, 1974, Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1976, Bishop and Shih, 1976.

120

α_v= +0.057₇(v+1/2)² - 0.005₁(v+1/2)³; these constants Foltz, Rank, et al., 1966 represent only B_0...3 which are the best known B_v values. Brannon, Church, et al., 1968 from the field-induced spectrum give a very slightly different B₀ (59.334₃ versus 59.336₂); see also Buijs and Gush, 1971. The formula B_v= 60.863₅ - 3.0763₈(v+1/2) + 0.0601₇(v+1/2)² - 0.0048_l(v+1/2)³ (v≤8) of Herzberg and Howe, 1959 holds up to v=8. Higher B_v values Herzberg and Howe, 1959 require higher and higher terms in the formula. All the constants given are Y₀₁,...Y₃₁ values; Fink, Wiggins, et al., 1965 have introduced Dunham corrections and give the "true" B_e = 60.867₉ Fink, Wiggins, et al., 1965. According to Ramsey, 1952 the hyperfine levels F=1 and 2 for J=1,v=0 are 1.823E-5 and 2.005E-5 cm^-1 below the F=0 component.

121

D_v= -0.0027₄(v+1/2) + 0.0004₀(v+1/2)²; H_v = [4.9-0.5(v+1/2)]E-5 Fink, Wiggins, et al., 1965; see also Foltz, Rank, et al., 1966.

122

Quadrupole 130 and field-induced sp..131

123

Raman cross sections Harney, Randolph, et al., 1975.

124

Rotational g factor g_J = 0.88291.

125

This is an upper limit (36118.3 ± 0.5 cm^-1), the lower limit being 4.4779 eV. According to Herzberg, 1970 the true value is probably close to the upper limit; see also Stwalley, 1970 who gives D₀⁰ = 36118.6 cm^-1 Stwalley, 1970 on the basis of a reassignment of the last vibrational levels of the B state. The most recent theoretical value of Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1968, 2 - including a small non-adiabatic correction of Bunker, 1979 - is D₀⁰= 36117.9 cm^-1 Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1968, 2, Bunker, 1979. An earlier independent calculation Hunter, 1966 (not including the non-adiabatic correction) gave D₀⁰= 36118.1 cm^-1 Hunter, 1966.

126

From the limit of the npσ, ¹Σ_u⁺ Rydberg series (124417.2 cm^-1) taking account of perturbations and pressure shift of high n lines Herzberg and Jungen, 1972. The earlier value of Takezawa, 1970, 2 was higher by 1.2 cm^-1 because it was not corrected for pressure shift. The latest theoretical (ab initio) value Jeziorski and Kolos, 1969 including relativistic, Lamb shift, and non-adiabatic corrections is 15.4259₀ eV; see Herzberg and Jungen, 1972.

127

The two J=2 levels are observed at 27631.3 and 27732.9 cm^-1 above J=0, v=0 of B ¹Σ_u⁺ Dieke, 1958. The ν₀₀ value given is an extrapolated average for J=0 and, because of the uncoupling, is rather uncertain.

128

The two J=1 levels are observed at 27385.8 and 27487.1 cm^-1 above J=0, v=0 of B ¹Σ_u⁺ Dieke, 1958. The ν₀₀ value given is an extrapolated average for J=0 and, because of the uncoupling, is rather uncertain.

129

Vibrational numbering of Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1969. See 98.

130

Fink, Wiggins, et al., 1965 give absolute intensity measurements of the quadrupole rotation-vibration spectrum (1-0, 2-0, 3-0) as well as corrections for pressure shifts; see also Margolis, 1973, McKellar, 1974, Chackerian and Giver, 1975. Dependence of quadrupole moment on r Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1965. Predicted intensities in the rotation-vibration spectrum James, 1969, in the rotation spectrum Dalgarno and Wright, 1972. Predicted lifetimes of rotation-vibration levels Black and Dalgarno, 1976, e.g. τ(v=1,J=1)= 1.17E+6 s Black and Dalgarno, 1976.

131

The rotation and rotation-vibration spectrum has been observed in pressure- induced absorption, see the review by Welsh, 1972.

References

Go To: Top, Gas phase thermochemistry data, Phase change data, Reaction thermochemistry data, Henry's Law data, Gas phase ion energetics data, Ion clustering data, Constants of diatomic molecules, Notes

Cox, Wagman, et al., 1984
Cox, J.D.; Wagman, D.D.; Medvedev, V.A., CODATA Key Values for Thermodynamics, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, 1984, 1. [all data]

Chase, 1998
Chase, M.W., Jr., NIST-JANAF Themochemical Tables, Fourth Edition, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Monograph 9, 1998, 1-1951. [all data]

Roder, Childs, et al., 1973
Roder, H.M.; Childs, G.E.; McCarty, R.D.; Angerhofer, P.E., Survey of the Prop. of the Hydrogen Isotopes Below Their Critical Temp, Natl. Bur. Stand. (U. S.), 1973. [all data]

Clusius and Weigand, 1940
Clusius, K.; Weigand, K., Melting Curves of the Gases A, Kr, Xe, CH4, CH3D, CD4, C2H4, C2H6, COS, and PH3 to 200 Atmospheres Pressure. The Chane of Volume on Melting, Z. Phys. Chem., Abt. B, 1940, 46, 1-37. [all data]

Henning and Otto, 1936
Henning, F.; Otto, J., Vapor pressure curves and triple points in the temperature region from 14 to 90 k, Phys. Z., 1936, 37, 633-8. [all data]

Onnes, Crommelin, et al., 1917
Onnes, H.K.; Crommelin, C.-A.; Cath, P.G., Isothermals of di-atomic substances and their binary mixtures. XIX. A preliminary determination of the critical point of hydrogen., Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet., 1917, 20, 178-184. [all data]

van Itterbeek, Verbeke, et al., 1964
van Itterbeek, A.; Verbeke, O.; Theewes, F.; Staes, K.; de Boelpaep, J., The Difference in Vapour Pressure Between Normal and Equilibrium Hydrogen. Vapour Pressure of Normal Hydrogen Between 20 ºK and 32 ºK, Physica (Amsterdam), 1964, 30, 6, 1238-1244, https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(64)90114-4 . [all data]

Rathke, Klingler, et al., 1992
Rathke, J.W.; Klingler, R.J.; Krause, T.R., Organometallics, 1992, 11, 585. [all data]

Bor, 1986
Bor, G., Pure & Appl. Chem., 1986, 58, 543. [all data]

Alemdaroglu, Penninger, et al., 1976
Alemdaroglu, N.H.; Penninger, J.M.L.; Oltay, E., Monatsh. Chem., 1976, 107, 1043. [all data]

Ungváry, 1972
Ungváry, F., J. Organometal. Chem., 1972, 36, 363. [all data]

Poë, Sampson, et al., 1993
Poë, A.J.; Sampson, C.N.; Smith, R.T.; Zheng, Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 3174. [all data]

Landrum and Hoff, 1985
Landrum, J.T.; Hoff, C.D., J. Organometal. Chem., 1985, 282, 215. [all data]

Pedley, 1994
Pedley, J.B., Thermodynamic Data and Structures of Organic Compounds; Thermodynamics Research Center Data Series, Vol I, Thermodynamics Research Center, College Station, 1994. [all data]

Hiraoka, 1987
Hiraoka, K., A Determination of the Stabilities of H3+(H2)n with n=1-9 from Measurements of the gas-Phase Ion Equilibria H3+(H2)n-1 + H2 = H3+(H2)n, J. Chem. Phys., 1987, 87, 7, 4048, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452909 . [all data]

Beuhler, Ehrenson, et al., 1983
Beuhler, R.J.; Ehrenson, S.; Friedman, L., Hydrogen Cluster Ion Equilibria, J. Chem. Phys., 1983, 79, 12, 5982, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445781 . [all data]

Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975
Hiraoka, K.; Kebarle, P., A Determination of the Stabilities of H5+, H7+, H9+, and H11+ from Measurement of the Gas Phase Ion Equilibria Hn+ + H2 = H(n + 2)+ (n = 3, 5, 7, 9), J. Chem. Phys., 1975, 62, 6, 2267, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.430751 . [all data]

Bennett and Field, 1972
Bennett, S.L.; Field, F.H., Reversible Reactions of Gaseous Ions. VII. The Hydrogen System, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, 94, 25, 8669, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00780a003 . [all data]

Shiell, Hu, et al., 2000
Shiell, R.C.; Hu, X.K.; Hu, Q.C.J.; Hepburn, J.W., Threshold Ion-pair Production spectroscopy (TIPPS) of H2 and D2, Faraday Disc. Chem. Soc., 2000, 115, 331, https://doi.org/10.1039/a909428h . [all data]

Pratt, McCormack, et al., 1992
Pratt, S.T.; McCormack, E.F.; Dehmer, J.L.; Dehmer, P.M., Field-Induced Ion-Pair Formation in Molecular Hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1992, 68, 5, 584, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.584 . [all data]

Gurvich, Veyts, et al.
Gurvich, L.V.; Veyts, I.V.; Alcock, C.B., Hemisphere Publishing, NY, 1989, V. 1 2, Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Substances, 4th Ed. [all data]

Lykke, Murray, et al., 1991
Lykke, K.R.; Murray, K.K.; Lineberger, W.C., Threshold Photodetachment of H-, Phys. Rev. A, 1991, 43, 11, 6104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.43.6104 . [all data]

Allinger, Dodziuk, et al., 1982
Allinger, N.L.; Dodziuk, H.; Rogers, D.W.; Naik, S.N., Heats of hydrogenation and formation of some 5-membered ring compounds by molecular mechanics calculations and direct measurements, Tetrahedron, 1982, 38, 1593-1597. [all data]

Roth and Lennartz, 1980
Roth, W.R.; Lennartz, H.W., Heats of hydrogenation. I. Determination of heats of hydrogenation with an isothermal titration calorimeter, Chem. Ber., 1980, 113, 1806-1817. [all data]

Turner, Jarrett, et al., 1973
Turner, R.B.; Jarrett, A.D.; Goebel, P.; Mallon, B.J., Heats of hydrogenation. 9. Cyclic acetylenes and some miscellaneous olefins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95, 790-792. [all data]

Rogers and McLafferty, 1971
Rogers, D.W.; McLafferty, F.J., A new hydrogen calorimeter. Heats of hydrogenation of allyl and vinyl unsaturation adjacent to a ring, Tetrahedron, 1971, 27, 3765-3775. [all data]

Dolliver, Gresham, et al., 1937
Dolliver, M.a.; Gresham, T.L.; Kistiakowsky, G.B.; Vaughan, W.E., Heats of organic reactions. V. Heats of hydrogenation of various hydrocarbons, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1937, 59, 831-841. [all data]

Cox and Pilcher, 1970
Cox, J.D.; Pilcher, G., Thermochemistry of Organic and Organometallic Compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1970, 1-636. [all data]

Doering, Roth, et al., 1989
Doering, W.E.; Roth, W.R.; Bauer, F.; Breuckmann, R.; Ebbrecht, T.; Herbold, M.; Schmidt, R.; Lennartz, H-W.; Lenoir, D.; Boese, R., Rotational barriers of strained olefines, Chem. Ber., 1989, 122, 1263-1266. [all data]

Rogers, Von Voithenberg, et al., 1978
Rogers, D.W.; Von Voithenberg, H.; Allinger, N.L., Heats of hydrogenation of the cis and trans isomers of cyclooctene, J. Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 360-361. [all data]

Turner and Meador, 1957
Turner, R.B.; Meador, W.R., Heats of hydrogenation. IV. Hydrogenation of some cis- and trans-cycloolefins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79, 4133-4136. [all data]

Conn, Kistiakowsky, et al., 1939
Conn, J.B.; Kistiakowsky, G.B.; Smith, E.A., Heats of organic reactions. VIII. Some further hydrogenations, including those of some acetylenes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1939, 61, 1868-1876. [all data]

Wang, Rosini, et al., 1995
Wang, K.; Rosini, G.P.; Nolan, S.P.; Goldman, A.S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 5082. [all data]

Rogers, Crooks, et al., 1987
Rogers, D.W.; Crooks, E.; Dejroongruang, K., Enthalpies of hydrogenation of the hexenes, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 1987, 19, 1209-1215. [all data]

Turner and Garner, 1958
Turner, R.B.; Garner, R.H., Heats of hydrogenation. V. Relative stabilities in certain exocyclic-endocyclic olefin pairs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1958, 80, 1424-1430. [all data]

Turner and Garner, 1957
Turner, R.B.; Garner, R.H., Heats of hydrogenation. V. Relative stabilities in certain exocyclic-endocyclic olefin pairs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 80, 1424-1430. [all data]

Turner and Garner, 1957, 2
Turner, R.B.; Garner, R.H., The stability relationship of 1-methyl-cyclopentene and methylenecyclopentane, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79, 253. [all data]

Fang and Rogers, 1992
Fang, W.; Rogers, D.W., Enthalpy of hydrogenation of the hexadienes and cis- and trans-1,3,5-hexatriene, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 2294-2297. [all data]

Molnar, Rachford, et al., 1984
Molnar, A.; Rachford, R.; Smith, G.V.; Liu, R., Heats of hydrogenation by a simple and rapid flow calorimetric method, Appl. Catal., 1984, 9, 219-223. [all data]

Turner, Mallon, et al., 1973
Turner, R.B.; Mallon, B.J.; Tichy, M.; Doering, W.v.E.; Roth, W.R.; Schroder, G., Heats of hydrogenation. X. Conjugative interaction in cyclic dienes and trienes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95, 8605-8610. [all data]

Kistiakowsky, Ruhoff, et al., 1936
Kistiakowsky, G.B.; Ruhoff, J.R.; Smith, H.A.; Vaughan, W.E., Heats of organic reactions. IV. Hydrogenation of some dienes and of benzene, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1936, 58, 146-153. [all data]

Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1976
Hiraoka, K.; Kebarle, P., Stabilities and Energetics of Pentacoordinated Carbonium Ions. The Isomeric C2H7+ Ions and Some Higher Analogues: C3H9+ and C4H11+, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 20, 6119, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00436a009 . [all data]

Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993
Kemper, P.R.; Bushnell, J.; Von Helden, G.; Bowers, M.T., Co+(H2)n Clusters: Binding Energies and Molecular Parameters, J. Chem Phys., 1993, 97, 1, 52, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100103a012 . [all data]

Haynes and Armentrout, 1996
Haynes, C.L.; Armentrout, P.B., Guided Ion Beam Determination of the Co+ - H2 Bond Dissociation energy, Chem Phys. Let., 1996, 249, 1-2, 64, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(95)01337-7 . [all data]

Rogers and Skanupong, 1974
Rogers, D.W.; Skanupong, S., Heats of hydrogenation of sixteen terminal monoolefins. The alternating effect, J. Phys. Chem., 1974, 78, 2569-2572. [all data]

Turner, Meador, et al., 1957
Turner, R.B.; Meador, W.R.; Winkler, R.E., Heats of hydrogenation. I. Apparatus and the heats of hydrogenation of bicyclo[2,2,1]heptene, bicyclo[2,2,1]heptadiene, bicyclo[2,2,2]octene and bicyclo[2,2,2]octadiene, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1957, 79, 4116-4121. [all data]

Roth, Klaerner, et al., 1983
Roth, W.R.; Klaerner, F.G.; Gerit, F.; Grimme, W.; Koeser, H.G.; Busch, R.; Muskulus, B.; Breuckmann, R.; Scholz, B.P.; Lennartz, H.W., Stereochemistry of the bicyclo[2.1.0]pentane ring opening: thermolysis of tricyclo[3.2.0.0(,)]heptane derivatives, Chem. Ber., 1983, 116, 2717-2737. [all data]

Hales and Herington, 1957
Hales, J.L.; Herington, E.F.G., Equilibrium between pyridine and piperidine, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1957, 53, 616-622. [all data]

Burrows and King, 1935
Burrows, G.H.; King, L.A., Jr., The free energy change that accompanies hydrogenation of pyridine to piperidine, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1935, 57, 1789-1791. [all data]

Turner, Nettleton, et al., 1958
Turner, R.B.; Nettleton, J.E.; Perelman, Heats of Hydrogenation. VI. Heats of hydrogenation of some substituted ethylenes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1958, 80, 1430-1433. [all data]

Crawford and Parks, 1936
Crawford, B.L., Jr.; Parks, G.S., The heat of hydrogenation of diisobutylene, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1936, 58, 373. [all data]

Kistiakowsky and Nickle, 1951
Kistiakowsky, G.B.; Nickle, A.G., Ethane-ethylene and propane-propylene equilibria, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc., 1951, 10, 175-187. [all data]

Kistiakowsky, Ruhoff, et al., 1935
Kistiakowsky, G.B.; Ruhoff, J.R.; Smith, H.A.; Vaughan, W.E., Heats of organic reactions. II. Hydrogenation of some simpler olefinic hydrocarbons, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1935, 57, 876-882. [all data]

Kemper, Bushnell, et al., 1993, 2
Kemper, P.R.; Bushnell, J.; Von Koppen, P.; Bowers, M.T., Binding Energies of Co+(H2/CH4/C2H6)1,2,3 Clusters, J. Phys. Chem., 1993, 97, 9, 1810, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100111a016 . [all data]

Wiberg, Crocker, et al., 1991
Wiberg, K.B.; Crocker, L.S.; Morgan, K.M., Thermochemical studies of carbonyl compounds. 5. Enthalpies of reduction of carbonyl groups, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 3447-3450. [all data]

Buckley and Herington, 1965
Buckley, E.; Herington, E.F.G., Equilibria in some secondary alcohol + hydrogen + ketone systems, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1965, 61, 1618-1625. [all data]

Dolliver, Gresham, et al., 1938
Dolliver, M.A.; Gresham, T.L.; Kistiakowsky, G.B.; Smith, E.A.; Vaughan, W.E., Heats of organic reactions. VI. Heats of hydrogenation of some oxygen-containing compounds, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1938, 60, 440-450. [all data]

Roth, Adamczak, et al., 1991
Roth, W.R.; Adamczak, O.; Breuckmann, R.; Lennartz, H.-W.; Boese, R., Die Berechnung von Resonanzenergien; das MM2ERW-Kraftfeld, Chem. Ber., 1991, 124, 2499-2521. [all data]

Rogers, Dejroongruang, et al., 1992
Rogers, D.W.; Dejroongruang, K.; Samuel, S.D.; Fang, W.; Zhao, Y., Enthalpies of hydrogenation of the octenes and the methylheptenes, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 1992, 24, 561-565. [all data]

Rogers and Siddiqui, 1975
Rogers, D.W.; Siddiqui, N.A., Heats of hydrogenation of large molecules. I. Esters of unsaturated fatty acids, J. Phys. Chem., 1975, 79, 574-577. [all data]

Rogers, Dagdagan, et al., 1979
Rogers, D.W.; Dagdagan, O.A.; Allinger, N.L., Heats of hydrogenation and formation of linear alkynes and a molecular mechanics interpretation, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 671-676. [all data]

Sicher, Svoboda, et al., 1966
Sicher, J.; Svoboda, M.; Zavada, J.; Turner, R.B.; Goebel, P., Sterochemical studies - XXXVI. An approach to conformational analysis of medium ring compounds. Unsaturated ten-membered ring derivates, Tetrahedron, 1966, 22, 659-671. [all data]

Doering, Roth, et al., 1988
Doering, W.E.; Roth, W.R.; Breuckmann, R.; Figge, L.; Lennartz, H.-W.; Fessner, W.-D.; Prinzbach, F.H., Verbotene Reaktionen. - [2 + 2]-Cycloreversion starrer Cyclobutane, Chem. Ber., 1988, 121, 1-9. [all data]

Rogers, Choi, et al., 1980
Rogers, D.W.; Choi, L.S.; Girellini, R.S., Heats of hydrogenation and formation of quadricyclene, norbornadiene, norbornene, and nortricyclene, J. Phys. Chem., 1980, 84, 1810-1814. [all data]

Connett, 1972
Connett, J.E., Chemical equilibria. 5. Measurement of equilibrium constants for the dehydrogenation of propanol by a vapour flow technique, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 1972, 4, 233-237. [all data]

Buckley and Cox, 1967
Buckley, E.; Cox, J.D., Chemical equilibria. Part 2.-Dehydrogenation of propanol and butanol, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1967, 63, 895-901. [all data]

Klingler R.J. and Rathke, 1992
Klingler R.J.; Rathke, J.W., Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31, 804. [all data]

Hunter and Lias, 1998
Hunter, E.P.; Lias, S.G., Evaluated Gas Phase Basicities and Proton Affinities of Molecules: An Update, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1998, 27, 3, 413-656, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.556018 . [all data]

Shiner, Gilligan, et al., 1993
Shiner, D.; Gilligan, J.M.; Cook, B.M.; Lichten, W., H₂, D₂, and HD ionization potentials by accurate calibration of several iodine lines, Phys. Rev. A, 1993, 47, 4042. [all data]

McCormack, Gilligan, et al., 1989
McCormack, E.; Gilligan, J.M.; Cornaggia, C.; Eyler, E.E., Measurement of high Rydberg states and the ionization potential of H₂, Phys. Rev. A, 1989, 39, 2260. [all data]

Glab and Hessler, 1987
Glab, W.L.; Hessler, J.P., Multiphoton excitation of high singlet np Rydberg states of molecular hydrogen: Spectroscopy and dynamics, Phys. Rev. A, 1987, 35, 2102. [all data]

Eyler, Short, et al., 1986
Eyler, E.E.; Short, R.C.; Pipkin, F.M., Precision spectroscopy of the nf triplet Rydberg states of H₂ and determination of the triplet ionization potential, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1986, 56, 2602. [all data]

Farber, Srivastava, et al., 1982
Farber, M.; Srivastava, R.D.; Moyer, J.W., Mass spectrometric determination of the thermodynamics of potassium hydroxide and minor potassium-containing species required in magnetohydrodynamic power systems, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 1982, 14, 1103. [all data]

Kimura, Katsumata, et al., 1981
Kimura, K.; Katsumata, S.; Achiba, Y.; Yamazaki, T.; Iwata, S., Ionization energies, Ab initio assignments, and valence electronic structure for 200 molecules in Handbook of HeI Photoelectron Spectra of Fundamental Organic Compounds, Japan Scientific Soc. Press, Tokyo, 1981. [all data]

Bieri, Schmelzer, et al., 1980
Bieri, G.; Schmelzer, A.; Asbrink, L.; Jonsson, M., Fluorine and the fluoroderivatives of acetylene and diacetylene studied by 30.4 nm He(II) photoelectron spectroscopy, Chem. Phys., 1980, 49, 213. [all data]

Huber and Herzberg, 1979
Huber, K.P.; Herzberg, G., Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. IV. Constants of Diatomic Molecules,, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1979, ,1. [all data]

Farber and Srivastava, 1977
Farber, M.; Srivastava, R.D., Mass spectrometric determination of the heats of formation of the silane fluorides, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1977, 51, 307. [all data]

Rabalais, Debies, et al., 1974
Rabalais, J.W.; Debies, T.P.; Berkosky, J.L.; Huang, J.-T.J.; Ellison, F.O., Calculated photoionization cross sections relative experimental photoionization intensities for a selection of small molecules, J. Chem. Phys., 1974, 61, 516. [all data]

Lee and Rabalais, 1974
Lee, T.H.; Rabalais, J.W., Vibrational transition probabilities in photoelectron spectra, J. Chem. Phys., 1974, 61, 2747. [all data]

Herzberg and Jungen, 1972
Herzberg, G.; Jungen, Ch., Rydberg series and ionization potential of the H₂ molecule, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1972, 41, 425. [all data]

Takezawa, 1970
Takezawa, S., Absorption spectrum of H₂ in the vacuum-uv region. II. Rydberg series converging to the first six vibrational levels of the H₂⁺ ground state, J. Chem. Phys., 1970, 52, 5793. [all data]

Asbrink, 1970
Asbrink, L., The photoelectron spectrum of H₂, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1970, 7, 549. [all data]

Lossing and Semeluk, 1969
Lossing, F.P.; Semeluk, G.P., Threshold ionization efficiency curves for monoenergetic electron impact on H₂, D₂, CH₄ and CD₄, Intern. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys., 1969, 2, 408. [all data]

Herzberg, 1969
Herzberg, G., Dissociation energy and ionization potential of molecular hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Letters, 1969, 23, 1081. [all data]

Villarejo, 1968
Villarejo, D., Measurement of threshold electrons in the photoionization of H₂ and D₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1968, 48, 4014. [all data]

Collin and Natalis, 1968
Collin, J.E.; Natalis, P., Vibrational and electronic ionic states of nitric oxide. An accurate method for measuring ionization potentials by photoelectron spectroscopy, Intern. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys., 1968, 1, 483. [all data]

Cermak, 1968
Cermak, V., Penning ionization electron spectroscopy. I. Determination of ionization potentials of polyatomic molecules, Collection Czech. Chem. Commun., 1968, 33, 2739. [all data]

Kerwin, Marmet, et al., 1963
Kerwin, L.; Marmet, P.; Clarke, E.M., Recent work with the electrostatic electron selector, Advan. Mass Spectrom., 1963, 2, 522. [all data]

Beutler and Junger, 1936
Beutler, H.; Junger, H.-O., Uber das Absorptionsspektrum des Wasserstoffs. III. Die Autoionisierung im Term 3pπ 1u des H₂ und ihre Auswahlgesetze. Bestimmung der lonisierungsenergie des H₂, Z. Physik, 1936, 100, 80. [all data]

Weitzel, Mahnert, et al., 1994
Weitzel, K.-M.; Mahnert, J.; Penno, M., ZEKE-PEPICO investigations of dissociation energies in ionic reactions, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1994, 224, 371. [all data]

Crowe and McConkey, 1973
Crowe, A.; McConkey, J.W., Dissociative ionization by electron impact. I. Protons from H₂, J. Phys. B:, 1973, 6, 2088. [all data]

Locht and Momigny, 1971
Locht, R.; Momigny, J., Mass spectrometric study of ion-pair processes in diatomic molecules: H₂, CO, NO and O₂, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys., 1971, 7, 121. [all data]

Curran, Laboratories
Curran, R.K., Negative ion formation in various gases at pressures up to .5 mm of Hg, Scientific Paper 62-908-113-P7, Westinghouse Research, Laboratories, Pittsburgh, 1962. [all data]

Shul, Passarella, et al., 1987
Shul, R.J.; Passarella, R.; Upshulte, B.L.; Keesee, R.G.; Castleman, A.W., Thermal Energy Reactions Invoving Ar+ Monomer and Dimer with N2, H2, Xe, and Kr, J. Chem. Phys., 1987, 86, 8, 4446, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452718 . [all data]

Dehmer and Pratt, 1982
Dehmer, P.M.; Pratt, S.T., Photoionization of ArKr, ArXe, and KrXe and bond dissociation energies of the rare gas dimer ions, J. Chem. Phys., 1982, 77, 4804. [all data]

Hiraoka and Kebarle, 1975, 2
Hiraoka, K.; Kebarle, P., Stability and Structure of H3CO+ Formed from COH+ + H2 at Low Temperature, J. Chem. Phys., 1975, 63, 4, 1688, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.431499 . [all data]

Hiraoka, Kudaka, et al., 1991
Hiraoka, K.; Kudaka, I.; Yamabe, S., Gas-Phase Solvation of CH5+ with H2, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1991, 184, 4, 271, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(91)85122-D . [all data]

Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1995
Bushnell, J.E.; Kemper, P.R.; Bowers, M.T., Factors Affecting sigma Bond Activation in Simple Systems; Measurement of Experimental Binding energies of Fe+(H2)1-6 Clusters, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 42, 15602, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100042a040 . [all data]

Hiraoka, Saluja, et al., 1979
Hiraoka, K.; Saluja, P.P.S.; Kebarle, P., Stabilities of Complexes (N2)nH+, (CO)nH+ and (O2)nH+ for n = 1 to 7 Based on Gas Phase Ion Equilibrium Measurements, Can. J. Chem., 1979, 57, 16, 2159, https://doi.org/10.1139/v79-346 . [all data]

Paulson and Henchman, 1984
Paulson, J.F.; Henchman, M.J., NATO Advanced Study Institute, Ionic Processes in the Gas Phase, Series C, M. A. Almoster - Ferreira, ed(s)., Reidel, Boston, 1984, 331. [all data]

Okumura, Yeh, et al., 1990
Okumura, M.; Yeh, L.I.; Myers, J.D.; Lee, Y.T., Infrared Spectra of the Solvated Hydronium Ion: Vibrational Predissociation Spectroscopy of Mass-Selected H3O+.(H2O)n.(H2)m, J. Phys. Chem., 1990, 94, 9, 3416, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100372a014 . [all data]

Bushnell, Kemper, et al., 1994
Bushnell, J.E.; Kemper, P.R.; Bowers, M.T., Na+/K+(H2)1,2 clusters: experiment, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 8, 2044, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100059a011 . [all data]

Wu, 1979
Wu, C.H., Binding Energies of LiH2 and LiH2+ and the Ionization Potential of LiH2, J. Chem. Phys., 1979, 71, 2, 783, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.438367 . [all data]

Crosswhite, 1972
Crosswhite, H.M., The hydrogen molecule wavelength tables of Gerhard Heinrich Dieke, Wiley-Interscience, Division of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1972, 616. [all data]

Dieke, 1958
Dieke, G.H., The molecular spectrum of hydrogen and its isotopes, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1958, 2, 494. [all data]

Sharp, 1971
Sharp, T.E., Potential-energy curves for molecular hydrogen and its ions, At. Data, 1971, 2, 119. [all data]

Richardson, 1934
Richardson, O.W., Molecular Hydrogen and Its Spectrum, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1934, 343. [all data]

Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934
Richardson, O.W.; Yarrow, F.R.S.; Rymer, T.B., The spectrum of H₂. Part III. New bands and band systems ending on 2s ³Σ and an extension of the singlet system ¹Q → 2p ¹Σ, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 1934, 147, 272. [all data]

Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 2
Richardson, O.W.; Yarrow, F.R.S.; Rymer, T.B., The spectrum of H₂. Part II - The band systems due to transitions from four new triplet states to 2p ³Π, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 1934, 147, 251. [all data]

Foster and Richardson, 1953
Foster, E.W.; Richardson, O., The fine structure of the 4d³Σ, ³Π_cd, ³Δ_d → 2p ³Π_cd transitions of the H₂ spectrum, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 1953, 217, 433. [all data]

Miller and Freund, 1975
Miller, T.A.; Freund, R.S., Anticrossings and microwave transitions between the k(4p) ³Π_u, v = 1, N = 3 and the p(4d) ³Σ_g⁺, v = 1, N = 5 levels of H₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1975, 62, 2240. [all data]

Cunningham and Dieke, 1950
Cunningham; Dieke, Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physics, Rpt. NYO-692, 1950, 1. [all data]

Freund and Miller, 1974
Freund, R.S.; Miller, T.A., Anticrossings and microwave transitions between electronic states of H₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1974, 60, 4900. [all data]

Gloersen and Dieke, 1965
Gloersen, P.; Dieke, G.H., Molecular spectra of hydrogen and helium in the infrared, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1965, 16, 191. [all data]

Richardson, Yarrow, et al., 1934, 3
Richardson, O.W.; Yarrow, F.R.S.; Rymer, T.B., The spectrum of H₂ (the ordinary hydrogen molecule). Part I - The 3, 4d ³Σ, Π, Δ → 2p ³Π and 3s ³Σ → 2p ³Π systems, Proc. R. Soc. London A, 1934, 147, 24. [all data]

Dieke and Blue, 1935
Dieke, G.H.; Blue, R.W., The Fulcher bands of HD and D₂, Phys. Rev., 1935, 47, 261. [all data]

Dieke, 1935
Dieke, G.H., The 3p³Σ→2s³Σ bands of HD and D₂, Phys. Rev., 1935, 48, 606. [all data]

Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1965
Kolos, W.; Wolniewicz, L., Potential-energy curves for the X¹Σ_g⁺, b³Σ_u⁺, and C¹Π_u states of the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys., 1965, 43, 2429. [all data]

Takezawa, 1970, 2
Takezawa, S., Absorption spectrum of H₂ in the vacuum-uv region. I. Rydberg states and ionization energies, J. Chem. Phys., 1970, 52, 2575. [all data]

Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1974
Dabrowski, I.; Herzberg, G., The absorption spectrum of D₂ from 1100 to 840 Å, Can. J. Phys., 1974, 52, 1110. [all data]

Chupka, Dehmer, et al., 1975
Chupka, W.A.; Dehmer, P.M.; Jivery, W.T., High resolution photoionization study of ion-pair formation in H₂, HD, and D₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1975, 63, 3929. [all data]

Kolos, 1976
Kolos, W., Ab initio potential energy curves and vibrational levels for the B", B«macron», and B'¹Σ_u+ states of the hydrogen molecule, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1976, 62, 429. [all data]

Monfils, 1965
Monfils, A., The absorption spectra of the molecules H₂, HD, and D₂. Part VI. Rotational analysis of the B', B", D, D', and D" states, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1965, 15, 265. [all data]

Monfils, 1968
Monfils, A., Absorption spectra of molecules H₂, HD, and D₂. VII. Vibrational constants of the B, B', B", C, D, D', and D" states, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1968, 25, 513. [all data]

Namioka, 1964
Namioka, T., Absorption spectra of H₂ in the vacuum ultraviolet region. II. The B'-X, B"-X, D-X, and D'-X bands, J. Chem. Phys., 1964, 41, 2141. [all data]

Richardson, 1937
Richardson, O.W., The band systems ending on the 1sσ 2sσ¹Σ_g(¹X_g) state of H₂. Part I., Proc. R. Soc. London A, 1937, 160, 487-507. [all data]

Dieke and Lewis, 1937
Dieke, G.H.; Lewis, M.N., Bands of HD and D₂ ending on the 2p¹Σ state, Phys. Rev., 1937, 52, 100. [all data]

Porto and Jannuzzi, 1963
Porto, S.P.S.; Jannuzzi, N., New singlet transitions in the near infrared spectrum of molecular hydrogen, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1963, 11, 378. [all data]

Namioka, 1965
Namioka, T., Absorption spectra of H₂ in the vacuum-ultraviolet region. III. Potential-energy curves for the B¹Σ_u⁺, C¹Π_u, B'¹Σ_u⁺, and D¹Π_u states, J. Chem. Phys., 1965, 43, 1636. [all data]

Dieke, 1949
Dieke, G.H., Bands from doubly excited levels of the hydrogen molecule, Phys. Rev., 1949, 76, 50. [all data]

Dieke, 1936
Dieke, G.H., The 2s¹Σ→2p¹Σ bands of the hydrogen molecule, Phys. Rev., 1936, 50, 797. [all data]

Porto and Dieke, 1955
Porto, S.P.S.; Dieke, G.H., Infrared spectrum of hydrogen and deuterium between one and two microns, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 1955, 45, 447. [all data]

Dieke, 1938
Dieke, G.H., Bands of H₂ ending on the 2p¹Π level, Phys. Rev., 1938, 54, 439. [all data]

Namioka, 1964, 2
Namioka, T., Absorption spectra of H₂ in the vacuum-ultraviolet region. I. The Lyman and the Werner bands, J. Chem. Phys., 1964, 40, 3154. [all data]

Herzberg and Howe, 1959
Herzberg, G.; Howe, L.L., The Lyman bands of molecular hydrogen, Can. J. Phys., 1959, 37, 636. [all data]

Wilkinson, 1968
Wilkinson, P.G., The electronic isotope shift in the Lyman bands of H₂, HD, and D₂, Can. J. Phys., 1968, 46, 1225. [all data]

Herzberg, 1950
Herzberg, G., Forbidden transitions in diatomic molecules. I. The quadrupole rotation-vibration spectrum of H₂, Can. J. Res. Sect. A, 1950, 28, 144. [all data]

Fink, Wiggins, et al., 1965
Fink, U.; Wiggins, T.A.; Rank, D.H., Frequency and intensity measurements on the quadrupole spectrum of molecule hydrogen, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1965, 18, 384. [all data]

Terhune and Peters, 1959
Terhune, R.W.; Peters, C.W., Electric field induced vibration rotation spectrum of H₂ and D₂, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1959, 3, 138. [all data]

Foltz, Rank, et al., 1966
Foltz, J.V.; Rank, D.H.; Wiggins, T.A., Determinations of some hydrogen molecular constants, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1966, 21, 203. [all data]

Brannon, Church, et al., 1968
Brannon, P.J.; Church, C.H.; Peters, C.W., Electric field induced spectra of molecular hydrogen, deuterium and deuterium hydride, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1968, 27, 44. [all data]

Stoicheff, 1957
Stoicheff, B.P., High resolution Raman spectroscopy of gases. IX. Spectra of H₂, HD, and D₂, Can. J. Phys., 1957, 35, 730. [all data]

Harrick and Ramsey, 1952
Harrick, N.J.; Ramsey, N.F., Rotational magnetic moment, magnetic susceptibilities, and electron distribution in the hydrogen molecule, Phys. Rev., 1952, 88, 228. [all data]

Barnes, Bray, et al., 1954
Barnes, R.G.; Bray, P.J.; Ramsey, N.F., Variations of hydrogen rotational magnetic moments with rotational quantum number and with isotopic mass, Phys. Rev., 1954, 94, 893. [all data]

Kolsky, Phipps, et al., 1952
Kolsky, H.G.; Phipps, T.E., Jr.; Ramsey, N.F.; Silsbee, H.B., Nuclear radiofrequency spectra of H₂ and D₂ in high and low magnetic fields, Phys. Rev., 1952, 87, 395. [all data]

Harrick, Barnes, et al., 1953
Harrick, N.J.; Barnes, R.G.; Bray, P.J.; Ramsey, N.F., Nuclear radiofrequency spectra of D₂ and H₂ in intermediate and strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev., 1953, 90, 260. [all data]

Ginter, 1967
Ginter, M.L., Molecular constants for the l-uncoupled electronic states 3d ^1,3Δ_g and 3d ^1,3Π_g of the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys., 1967, 46, 3687. [all data]

Freund, Miller, et al., 1973
Freund, R.S.; Miller, T.A.; Zegarski, B.R., Fine structure of para H₂, k(4p)³Π_u, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1973, 23, 120. [all data]

Miller, Freund, et al., 1974
Miller, T.A.; Freund, R.S.; Zagarski, B.R., Fine and hyperfine structure of ortho-H₂, k(4p) ³Π_u, J. Chem. Phys., 1974, 60, 3195. [all data]

Ginter, 1966
Ginter, M.L., Spectrum and structure of the He₂ molecule. IV. Characterization of the singlet and triplet states associated with the UAO's 3dσ, 3dπ, and 3dδ, J. Chem. Phys., 1966, 45, 248. [all data]

Herzberg, 1967
Herzberg, G., A new predissociation of the H₂ molecule, Sci. Light (Tokyo), 1967, 16, 14. [all data]

Browne, 1965
Browne, J.C., Quantum mechanical potential energy curves for the ¹Π_u and ³Π_u states of He₂ and the ¹Π_g and ³Π_g states of H₂, Phys. Rev. A: Gen. Phys., 1965, 138, 9. [all data]

Wright and Davidson, 1965
Wright, W.M.; Davidson, E.R., 1s₃d ³Π_g state of the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys., 1965, 43, 840. [all data]

Freund and Miller, 1973
Freund, R.S.; Miller, T.A., Fine structure of para-H₂ d(3p) ³Π_u (ν=0-3) via microwave optical magnetic resonance induced by electrons, J. Chem. Phys., 1973, 58, 3565. [all data]

Dieke, 1935, 2
Dieke, G.H., The triplet 3p complex of the hydrogen molecule, Phys. Rev., 1935, 48, 610. [all data]

Beutler and Junger, 1936, 2
Beutler, H.; Junger, H.-O., Pradissoziation und autoionisierung in den termfolgen des Wasserstoff-(H₂^-) spektrums, Z. Phys., 1936, 101, 285. [all data]

Cahill, 1969
Cahill, P., Determination of the lifetime of the d³Π_u state of H₂, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 1969, 59, 875. [all data]

Marechal, Jost, et al., 1972
Marechal, M.A.; Jost, R.; Lombardi, M., Lifetimes, g factors, and collision cross sections of hydrogen molecules in the (1s₃p) ³Π_u level, Phys. Rev. A: Gen. Phys., 1972, 5, 732. [all data]

Miller and Freund, 1974
Miller, T.A.; Freund, R.S., Singlet-triplet anticrossings in H₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1974, 61, 2160. [all data]

Jost and Lombardi, 1974
Jost, R.; Lombardi, M., Determination of the singlet-triplet separation of H₂ by a "level-anticrossing" technique, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1974, 33, 53. [all data]

Kolos, 1975
Kolos, W., Revised theoretical energy for the a³Σ_g⁺ state of H₂, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1975, 31, 43. [all data]

Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1968
Kolos, W.; Wolniewicz, L., Vibrational and rotational energies of the B¹Σ_u⁺, C¹Π_u, C¹Π_u, and a³Σ_g⁺ states of the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys., 1968, 48, 3672. [all data]

Smith and Chevalier, 1972
Smith, W.H.; Chevalier, R., Radiative-lifetime studies of the emission continua of the hydrogen and deuterium molecules, Astrophys. J., 1972, 177, 835. [all data]

King, Read, et al., 1975
King, G.C.; Read, F.H.; Imhof, R.E., The measurement of molecular lifetimes by the photon-photon delayed coincidence method, J. Phys. B:, 1975, 8, 665. [all data]

Jette, 1974
Jette, A.N., Spin-other-orbit and spin-spin interactions in the metastable, C³Π_u(1s,2p) state of H₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1974, 61, 816. [all data]

Jette and Miller, 1974
Jette, A.N.; Miller, T.A., Fine structure in Rydberg states of the H₂ molecule, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1974, 29, 547. [all data]

Lichten, 1960
Lichten, W., Metastable hydrogen molecules, Phys. Rev., 1960, 120, 848. [all data]

Frey and Mizushima, 1962
Frey, D.A.; Mizushima, M., Hyperfine structure of the hydrogen molecule in its metastable ³Π_u state, Phys. Rev., 1962, 128, 2683. [all data]

Lichten, 1962
Lichten, W., Measurements of lifetimes of metastable hydrogen molecules: a forbidden predissociation in H₂, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 1962, 7, 43. [all data]

Chiu, 1964
Chiu, L.-Y.C., Electron magnetic perturbation in diatomic molecules of Hund's case b, J. Chem. Phys., 1964, 40, 2276. [all data]

Johnson, 1972
Johnson, C.E., Lifetime of the c³Π_u metastable state of H₂, D₂, and HD, Phys. Rev. A: Gen. Phys., 1972, 5, 1026. [all data]

Johnson, 1974
Johnson, C.E., Quenching of the c³Π_u metastable state of H₂ and D₂ by an electric field, Phys. Rev. A: Gen. Phys., 1974, 9, 576. [all data]

Kagann and English, 1976
Kagann, R.H.; English, T.C., Stark-Zeeman effect of metastable orthohydrogen and parahydrogen, Phys. Rev. A: Gen. Phys., 1976, 13, 1451. [all data]

English and Albritton, 1975
English, T.C.; Albritton, D.L., Theory of the Stark effect of metastable parahydrogen, J. Phys. B:, 1975, 8, 2123. [all data]

Dunn, 1966
Dunn, G.H., Franck-Condon factors for the ionization of H₂ and D₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1966, 44, 2592. [all data]

Villarejo, 1968, 2
Villarejo, D., Vibration-rotation interaction effects in calculated Franck-Condon factors. I. The ionization of H₂ and D₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1968, 49, 2523. [all data]

Nicholls, 1968
Nicholls, R.W., Franck-Condon factors for ionizing transitions of O₂, CO, NO and H₂ and for the NO⁺(A¹-Σx¹Σ) band system, J. Phys. B:, 1968, 1, 1192. [all data]

Ford, Docken, et al., 1975
Ford, A.L.; Docken, K.K.; Dalgarno, A., Cross sections for photoionization of vibrationally excited molecular hydrogen, Astrophys. J., 1975, 200, 788. [all data]

Turner, 1968
Turner, D.W., High resolution molecular photoelectron spectroscopy. I. Fine structure in the spectra of hydrogen and oxygen, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), 1968, A307, 15. [all data]

Chupka and Berkowitz, 1968
Chupka, W.A.; Berkowitz, J., Photoionization of the H₂ molecule near threshold, J. Chem. Phys., 1968, 48, 5726. [all data]

Comes and Wellern, 1968
Comes, F.J.; Wellern, H.O., Die Spektroskopie des Wasserstoffmolekuls in der Nahe seiner Ionisierungs-grenze., Z. Naturforsch., 1968, 23a, 881. [all data]

Backx, Wight, et al., 1976
Backx, C.; Wight, G.R.; van der Wiel, M.J., Oscillator strengths (10-70 eV) for absorption, ionization and dissociation in H₂, HD and D₂, obtained by an electron-ion coincidence method, J. Phys. B:, 1976, 9, 315. [all data]

Monfils, 1968, 2
Monfils, A., Calcul des fonctions potentielles de divers etats signulets excites des molecules H₂, HD et D₂, Bull. Cl. Sci. Acad. R. Belg., 1968, 54, 44. [all data]

Herzberg, 1971
Herzberg, G., Beutler-Fano shape in the predissociation of H₂ in Topics in Modern Physics, W.E. Brittin; Odabasi,H., ed(s)., Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1971, 191-197. [all data]

Comes and Schumpe, 1971
Comes, F.J.; Schumpe, G., Einfluss der Rotation auf die Lebensdauer pradissoziierender Molekule, Z. Naturforsch. A, 1971, 26, 538. [all data]

Fiquet-Fayard and Gallais, 1971
Fiquet-Fayard, F.; Gallais, O., Calculs numeriques de facteurs de Franck-Condon et effets isotopiques: perturbation de H₂ C¹Π_u et predissociation de H₂ D¹Π_u, Mol. Phys., 1971, 20, 527. [all data]

Julienne, 1971
Julienne, P.S., Predissociation of the H₂ D¹Π_u state, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1971, 8, 27. [all data]

Fiquet-Fayard and Gallais, 1972
Fiquet-Fayard, F.; Gallais, O., Predissociation of H₂ and D₂ (D¹Π_u): comparison of calculated and experimental line-widths, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1972, 16, 18. [all data]

Comes and Wenning, 1969
Comes, F.J.; Wenning, U., Photoinduzierte Stossprozesse metastabiler Wasserstoffatome mit H₂ im Energiebereich von 0,05 - 0,47 eV, Z. Naturforsch. A, 1969, 24, 587. [all data]

Mentall and Gentieu, 1970
Mentall, J.E.; Gentieu, E.P., Lyman-α fluorescence from the photodissociation of H₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1970, 52, 5641. [all data]

Comes and Wenning, 1970
Comes, F.J.; Wenning, U., Pradissoziation im elektrischen Feld - ein neues Phanomen in der Molekulspektroskopie, Z. Naturforsch. A, 1970, 25, 406. [all data]

Spindler, 1969
Spindler, R.J., Jr., Franck-Condon factors for band systems of molecular hydrogen. I. The (B¹Σ_u⁺ - X¹Σ_g⁺), (I¹Π_g - B¹Σ_u⁺) and (d³Π_u - a³Σ_g⁺) systems, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1969, 9, 597. [all data]

Cook and Metzger, 1964
Cook, G.R.; Metzger, P.H., Photoionization and absorption cross sections of H₂ and D₂ in the vacuum ultraviolet region, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 1964, 54, 968. [all data]

Lewis, 1974
Lewis, B.R., Experimentally-determined oscillator strengths for molecular hydrogen. II. The Lyman and Werner bands below 900 Å, the B'-X and the D-X bands, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1974, 14, 537. [all data]

Mulliken, 1964
Mulliken, R.S., Rare-gas and hydrogen molecule electronic states, noncrossing rule, and recombination of electrons with rare-gas and hydrogen ions, Phys. Rev., 1964, 136, 962. [all data]

Dieke, Cunningham, et al., 1953
Dieke, G.H.; Cunningham, S.P.; Byrne, F.T., The Zeeman effect in the molecular spectra of hydrogen, Phys. Rev., 1953, 92, 81. [all data]

van der Linde and Dalby, 1972
van der Linde, J.; Dalby, F.W., Zero field level crossing in excited states of molecular hydrogen, Can. J. Phys., 1972, 50, 287. [all data]

Melieres-Marechal and Lombardi, 1974
Melieres-Marechal, M.-A.; Lombardi, M., Weak hyperfine structure measurement using the magnetic repolarization effect: application to N = 1 v = 1 (1s₃d)¹Σ, J. Chem. Phys., 1974, 61, 2600. [all data]

Freund and Miller, 1972
Freund, R.S.; Miller, T.A., Microwave optical magnetic resonance induced by electrons (MOMRIE) in H₂ G(3d ¹Σ_g⁺), J. Chem. Phys., 1972, 56, 2211. [all data]

Ford, Browne, et al., 1975
Ford, A.L.; Browne, J.C.; Shipsey, E.J.; DeVries, P., Adiabatic ab initio potential curves for the B' ¹Σ_u⁺ state of H₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1975, 63, 362. [all data]

Wolniewicz, 1975
Wolniewicz, L., Theoretical investigation of the B'¹Σ_u⁺ state of the hydrogen molecule, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1975, 31, 248. [all data]

Davidson, 1961
Davidson, E.R., First excited ¹Σ_g⁺ state of the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys., 1961, 35, 1189. [all data]

Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1969
Kolos, W.; Wolniewicz, L., Theoretical investigation of the lowest double-minimum state E, F¹Σ_g⁺ of the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys., 1969, 50, 3228. [all data]

Lin, 1974
Lin, C.S., Theoretical analysis of the vibrational structure of the electronic transitions involving a state with double minimum: E,F ¹Σ_g⁺ of H₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1974, 60, 4660. [all data]

Wolniewicz, 1969
Wolniewicz, L., Theoretical investigation of the transition probabilities in the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys., 1969, 51, 5002. [all data]

King and Van Vleck, 1939
King, G.W.; Van Vleck, J.H., Dipole-dipole resonance forces, Phys. Rev., 1939, 55, 1165. [all data]

Mulliken, 1960
Mulliken, R.S., The interaction of differently excited like atoms at large distances, Phys. Rev., 1960, 120, 1674. [all data]

Rothenberg and Davidson, 1966
Rothenberg, S.; Davidson, E.R., Hydrogen-molecule excited states: ¹Π_u, J. Chem. Phys., 1966, 44, 730. [all data]

Kolos, 1967
Kolos, W., Long-range interaction between 1s and 2s or 2p hydrogen atoms, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 1967, 1, 169. [all data]

Julienne, 1973
Julienne, P.S., Nonadiabatic effects in the B, C, B', and D states of H₂, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1973, 48, 508. [all data]

Ford, 1974
Ford, A.L., Lambda-Doubling in the C¹Π_u state of H₂, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1974, 53, 364. [all data]

Hesser, 1968
Hesser, J.E., Absolute Transition Probabilities in Ultraviolet Molecular Spectra, J. Chem. Phys., 1968, 48, 6, 2518, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1669477 . [all data]

Geiger and Schmoranzer, 1969
Geiger, J.; Schmoranzer, H., Electronic and vibrational transition probabilities of isotopic hydrogen molecules H₂, HD, and D₂ based on electron energy loss spectra, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1969, 32, 39. [all data]

Schmoranzer and Geiger, 1973
Schmoranzer, H.; Geiger, J., Light emission of electron impact excited hydrogen molecules and the dependence of electronic transition moment on internuclear distance, J. Chem. Phys., 1973, 59, 6153. [all data]

Fabian and Lewis, 1974
Fabian, W.; Lewis, B.R., Experimentally determined oscillator strengths for molecular hydrogen. I. The Lyman and Werner bands above 900 Å, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1974, 14, 523. [all data]

Allison and Dalgarno, 1970
Allison, A.C.; Dalgarno, A., Band oscillator strengths and transition probabilities for the Lyman and Werner systems of H₂, HD, and D₂, At. Data, 1970, 1, 289. [all data]

Allison and Dalgarno, 1970, 2
Allison, A.C.; Dalgarno, A., Isotope effects in the Lyman and Werner systems of molecular hydrogen, Mol. Phys., 1970, 19, 567. [all data]

Dalgarno and Stephens, 1970
Dalgarno, A.; Stephens, T.L., Discrete absorption and photodissociation of molecular hydrogen, Astrophys. J., 1970, 160, 107. [all data]

Stephens and Dalgarno, 1972
Stephens, T.L.; Dalgarno, A., Spontaneous radiative dissociation in molecular hydrogen, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1972, 12, 569. [all data]

Takezawa, Innes, et al., 1966
Takezawa, S.; Innes, F.R.; Tanaka, Y., Selective enhancement in hydrogenlike molecules with the rare gases. I. H₂ with Ar and Kr, J. Chem. Phys., 1966, 45, 2000. [all data]

Hodson and Dreyfus, 1972
Hodson, R.T.; Dreyfus, R.W., Vacuum-UV laser action observed in H₂ Werner bands: 1161-1240 Å, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1972, 28, 536. [all data]

Waynant, 1972
Waynant, R.W., Observations of gain by stimulated emission in the Werner band of molecular hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1972, 28, 533. [all data]

Herzberg, 1970
Herzberg, G., The dissociation energy of the hydrogen molecule, J.Mol. Spectry., 1970, 33, 147. [all data]

Tobias and Vanderslice, 1961
Tobias, I.; Vanderslice, J.T., Potential energy curves for the X¹Σ_g⁺ and B¹Σ_u⁺ states of hydrogen, J. Chem. Phys., 1961, 35, 1852. [all data]

Stwalley, 1973
Stwalley, W.C., Potential energy curve of the B¹Σ_u⁺ state of H₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1973, 58, 536. [all data]

Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1975
Kolos, W.; Wolniewicz, L., New ab initio potential energy curve and vibrational levels for the B¹Σ_u⁺ state of the hydrogen molecule, Can. J. Phys., 1975, 53, 2189. [all data]

Halmann and Laulicht, 1966
Halmann, M.; Laulicht, I., Isotope effects on Franck-Condon factors. V. Electronic transitions of isotopic O₂, N₂, C₂, and H₂ molecules, J. Chem. Phys., 1966, 44, 2398. [all data]

Dalgarno and Allison, 1968
Dalgarno, A.; Allison, A.C., Band oscillator strengths of the Lyman system of molecular hydrogen, Astrophys. J., 1968, 154, 95. [all data]

Lin, 1975
Lin, C.S., Calculation of the Franck-Condon factors: single-α approximation method, Can. J. Phys., 1975, 53, 310. [all data]

Villarejo, Stockbauer, et al., 1969
Villarejo, D.; Stockbauer, R.; Inghram, M.G., Vibration-rotation interaction effects in calculated Franck-Condon factors. II. Hydrogen Lyman and Fulcher bands, J. Chem. Phys., 1969, 50, 1754. [all data]

Becker and Fink, 1971
Becker, K.H.; Fink, E.H., Relative line intensities in the Lyman bands of HD and H₂, Z. Naturforsch. A, 1971, 26, 319. [all data]

Geiger and Topschowsky, 1966
Geiger, J.; Topschowsky, M., Ubergangswahrscheinlichkeiten im Elektronen- und Schwingungsspektrum des Wasserstoffmolekuls, Z. Naturforsch. A, 1966, 21, 626. [all data]

Haddad, Lokan, et al., 1968
Haddad, G.N.; Lokan, K.H.; Farmer, A.J.D.; Carver, J.H., An experimental determination of the oscillator strengths for some transitions in the Lyman bands of molecular hydrogen, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1968, 8, 1193. [all data]

Hesser, Brooks, et al., 1968
Hesser, J.E.; Brooks, N.H.; Lawrence, G.M., H₂ Lyman-band oscillator strengths, J. Chem. Phys., 1968, 49, 5388. [all data]

Schmoranzer, 1975
Schmoranzer, H., Electronic transition moment in the B¹Σ_u⁺ -X¹Σ_g⁺ Lyman band system of H₂ based on keV electron impact excited vacuum UV emission intensities, J. Phys. B:, 1975, 8, 1139. [all data]

Hodgson, 1970
Hodgson, R.T., Vacuum-ultraviolet laser action observed in the Lyman bands of molecular hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1970, 25, 494. [all data]

Waynant, Shipman, et al., 1970
Waynant, R.W.; Shipman, J.D., Jr.; Elton, R.C.; Ali, A.W., Vacuum ultraviolet laser emission from molecular hydrogen, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1970, 17, 383. [all data]

Dalgarno, Herzberg, et al., 1970
Dalgarno, A.; Herzberg, G.; Stephens, T.L., A new continuous emission spectrum of the hydrogen molecule, Astrophys. J., 1970, 162, 49. [all data]

Allison and Dalgarno, 1969
Allison, A.C.; Dalgarno, A., Photodissociation of vibrationally excited H₂, HD, and D₂ by absorption into the continua of the Lyman and Werner systems, At. Data, 1969, 1, 91. [all data]

Herzberg and Monfils, 1960
Herzberg, G.; Monfils, A., The dissociation energies of the H₂, HD, and D₂ molecules, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1960, 5, 482. [all data]

Weissman, Vanderslice, et al., 1963
Weissman, S.; Vanderslice, J.T.; Battino, R., On the recalculation of the potential curves for the ground states of I₂ and H₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1963, 39, 2226. [all data]

Ginter and Battino, 1965
Ginter, M.L.; Battino, R., On the calculation of potential curves by the Rydberg-Klein-Rees method. I. Experimental limitations, extrapolation procedures, and applications to the third-group hydrides, J. Chem. Phys., 1965, 42, 3222. [all data]

Zhirnov and Vasilevskii, 1970
Zhirnov, N.I.; Vasilevskii, A.S., A new method for constructing the potential curves of diatomic molecules on the basis of spectroscopic data. IV. The potential curve of the ground electronic state of the H₂ molecule, Opt. Spectrosc. Engl. Transl., 1970, 29, 352, In original 658. [all data]

Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1974
Kolos, W.; Wolniewicz, L., Variational calculation of the long-range interaction between two ground-state hydrogen atoms, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1974, 24, 457. [all data]

Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1975, 2
Kolos, W.; Wolniewicz, L., Improved potential energy curve and vibrational energies for the electronic ground state of the hydrogen molecule, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1975, 54, 303. [all data]

Waech and Bernstein, 1967
Waech, T.G.; Bernstein, R.B., Calculated spectrum of quasibound states for H₂(¹Σ_g⁺) and resonances in H + H scattering, J. Chem. Phys., 1967, 46, 4905. [all data]

Kolos and Wolniewicz, 1968, 2
Kolos, W.; Wolniewicz, L., Improved theoretical ground-state energy of the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys., 1968, 49, 404. [all data]

Allison, 1969
Allison, A.C., Quasi-bound states in H₂, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1969, 3, 371. [all data]

Herzberg and Mckenzie, 1979
Herzberg; Mckenzie, To be Published cited in Huber and Herzberg, 1979, 2, 1979, 255. [all data]

Bunker, 1972
Bunker, P.R., On the breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation for a diatomic molecule, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1972, 5, 478. [all data]

Orlikowski and Wolniewicz, 1974
Orlikowski, T.; Wolniewicz, L., Nonadiabatic corrections to the vibrational energies of the hydrogen molecule, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1974, 24, 461. [all data]

Dabrowski and Herzberg, 1976
Dabrowski, I.; Herzberg, G., The absorption and emission spectra of HD in the vacuum ultraviolet, Can. J. Phys., 1976, 54, 525. [all data]

Bishop and Shih, 1976
Bishop, D.M.; Shih, S.-K., An effective Schrodinger equation for the rovibronic energies of H₂ and D₂, J. Chem. Phys., 1976, 64, 162. [all data]

Buijs and Gush, 1971
Buijs, H.L.; Gush, H.P., Statis field induced spectrum of hydrogen, Can. J. Phys., 1971, 49, 2366. [all data]

Ramsey, 1952
Ramsey, N.F., Theory of molecular hydrogen and deuterium in magnetic fields, Phys. Rev., 1952, 85, 60. [all data]

Harney, Randolph, et al., 1975
Harney, R.C.; Randolph, J.E.; Milanovich, F.P., Relative Raman cross sections for the S(0) through S(4) rotational transitions in hydrogen, Astrophys. J., 1975, 200, 179. [all data]

Stwalley, 1970
Stwalley, W.C., The dissociation energy of the hydrogen molecule using long-range forces, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1970, 6, 241. [all data]

Bunker, 1979
Bunker, Unpublished cited in Huber and Herzberg, 1979, 2, 1979, 255. [all data]

Hunter, 1966
Hunter, G., Adiabatic dissociation energies for the ground states of the H₂, HD, and D₂ molecules, J. Chem. Phys., 1966, 45, 3022. [all data]

Jeziorski and Kolos, 1969
Jeziorski, B.; Kolos, W., On the ionization potential of H₂, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1969, 3, 677. [all data]

Margolis, 1973
Margolis, J.S., Measurement of some 1-0 H₂ quadrupole transition strengths, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1973, 48, 409. [all data]

McKellar, 1974
McKellar, A.R.W., The significance of pressure shifts for the interpretation of H₂ quadrupole lines in planetary spectra, Icarus, 1974, 22, 212. [all data]

Chackerian and Giver, 1975
Chackerian, C., Jr.; Giver, L.P., Density-dependent frequency shift of the hydrogen S₂(1) quadrupole line, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1975, 58, 339. [all data]

James, 1969
James, T.C., Intensity of the quadrupole rotation-vibration spectrum of molecular hydrogen, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1969, 32, 512. [all data]

Dalgarno and Wright, 1972
Dalgarno, A.; Wright, E.L., Infrared emissivities of H₂ and HD, Astrophys. J., 1972, 174, 49. [all data]

Black and Dalgarno, 1976
Black, J.H.; Dalgarno, A., Interstellar H₂: the population of excited rotational states and the infrared response to ultraviolet radiation, Astrophys. J., 1976, 203, 132. [all data]

Welsh, 1972
Welsh, H.L., Pressure-induced absorption spectra of hydrogen in MTP International Review of Science; Physical Chemistry, Series 1, Vol. 3, London, Butterworths, Baltimore, University Park Press, 1972, 33-71. [all data]

Huber and Herzberg, 1979, 2
Huber, K.P.; Herzberg, G., Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. IV. Constants of Diatomic Molecules, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 1979, 716. [all data]

Notes

Symbols used in this document:

AE	Appearance energy
IE (evaluated)	Recommended ionization energy
P_c	Critical pressure
P_triple	Triple point pressure
S°_{gas,1 bar}	Entropy of gas at standard conditions (1 bar)
T	Temperature
T_c	Critical temperature
T_triple	Triple point temperature
d(ln(k_H))/d(1/T)	Temperature dependence parameter for Henry's Law constant
k°_H	Henry's Law constant at 298.15K
Δ_rG°	Free energy of reaction at standard conditions
Δ_rH°	Enthalpy of reaction at standard conditions
Δ_rS°	Entropy of reaction at standard conditions
ρ_c	Critical density

Data from NIST Standard Reference Database 69: NIST Chemistry WebBook
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) uses its best efforts to deliver a high quality copy of the Database and to verify that the data contained therein have been selected on the basis of sound scientific judgment. However, NIST makes no warranties to that effect, and NIST shall not be liable for any damage that may result from errors or omissions in the Database.
Customer support for NIST Standard Reference Data products.