Titanium ion (1+)
- Formula: Ti+
- Molecular weight: 47.866
- IUPAC Standard InChI: InChI=1S/Ti/q+1
- IUPAC Standard InChIKey: NWCHXEGXZIUQJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N
- CAS Registry Number: 14067-04-0
- Chemical structure:
This structure is also available as a 2d Mol file - Other names: Titanium cation
- Permanent link for this species. Use this link for bookmarking this species for future reference.
- Information on this page:
- Other data available:
- Options:
Reaction thermochemistry data
Go To: Top, References, Notes
Data compilation copyright by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce on behalf of the U.S.A. All rights reserved.
Data compiled as indicated in comments:
RCD - Robert C. Dunbar
M - Michael M. Meot-Ner (Mautner) and Sharon G. Lias
Note: Please consider using the reaction search for this species. This page allows searching of all reactions involving this species. A general reaction search form is also available. Future versions of this site may rely on reaction search pages in place of the enumerated reaction displays seen below.
Individual Reactions
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + C6H6 = (Ti+ • C6H6)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 213. | kJ/mol | RAK | Gapeev and Dunbar, 2002 | RCD |
| ΔrH° | 259. ± 9.2 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Meyer, Khan, et al., 1995 | RCD |
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 259. (+8.8,-0.) | CID | Meyer, Khan, et al., 1995 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + H2O = (Ti+ • H2O)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 160. ± 10. | kJ/mol | CID | Magnera, David, et al., 1989 | gas phase; M |
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 154. (+5.9,-0.) | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( •
) +
= (
• 2
)
By formula: (Ti+ • C6H6) + C6H6 = (Ti+ • 2C6H6)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 253. ± 18. | kJ/mol | CIDT | Meyer, Khan, et al., 1995 | RCD |
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 253. (+18.,-0.) | CID | Meyer, Khan, et al., 1995 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + C2H4 = (Ti+ • C2H4)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 146. ± 11. | kJ/mol | CIDT | Sievers, Jarvis, et al., 1998 | RCD |
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 119. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; ΔrH>=, guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 2
) +
= (
• 3
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 2H2O) + H2O = (Ti+ • 3H2O)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66.9 (+7.1,-0.) | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 3
) +
= (
• 4
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 3H2O) + H2O = (Ti+ • 4H2O)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.7 (+7.9,-0.) | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( •
) +
= (
• 2
)
By formula: (Ti+ • H2O) + H2O = (Ti+ • 2H2O)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136. (+5.0,-0.) | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 11
) +
= (
• 12
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 11Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 12Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 469.9 | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 17
) +
= (
• 18
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 17Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 18Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 449.8 | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 10
) +
= (
• 11
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 10Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 11Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 406. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 12
) +
= (
• 13
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 12Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 13Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 13
) +
= (
• 14
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 13Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 14Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 14
) +
= (
• 15
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 14Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 15Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 15
) +
= (
• 16
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 15Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 16Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 344. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 16
) +
= (
• 17
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 16Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 17Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 318. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 18
) +
= (
• 19
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 18Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 19Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 409. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 19
) +
= (
• 20
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 19Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 20Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 395. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 20
) +
= (
• 21
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 20Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 21Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 410. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 9
) +
= (
• 10
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 9Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 10Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 344. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 2
) +
= (
• 3
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 2Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 3Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 338. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 3
) +
= (
• 4
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 3Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 4Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 340. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 4
) +
= (
• 5
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 4Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 5Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 354. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 5
) +
= (
• 6
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 5Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 6Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 6
) +
= (
• 7
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 6Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 7Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 278. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 7
) +
= (
• 8
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 7Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 8Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 346. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 8
) +
= (
• 9
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 8Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 9Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 335. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( •
) +
= (
• 2
)
By formula: (Ti+ • Ti) + Ti = (Ti+ • 2Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 230. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + C2H2 = (Ti+ • C2H2)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 253. (+20.,-0.) | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + Ti = (Ti+ • Ti)
Enthalpy of reaction
| ΔrH° (kJ/mol) | T (K) | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 244. | CID | Armentrout and Kickel, 1994 | gas phase; guided ion beam CID; M |
( • 2
) +
= (
• 3
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 2H3N) + H3N = (Ti+ • 3H3N)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 176. ± 15. | kJ/mol | CIDT | Walter and Armentrout, 1998 | RCD |
( • 3
) +
= (
• 4
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 3H3N) + H3N = (Ti+ • 4H3N)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 156. ± 10. | kJ/mol | CIDT | Walter and Armentrout, 1998 | RCD |
( •
) +
= (
• 2
)
By formula: (Ti+ • H3N) + H3N = (Ti+ • 2H3N)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 175. ± 15. | kJ/mol | CIDT | Walter and Armentrout, 1998 | RCD |
( • 2
) +
= (
• 3
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 2CO) + CO = (Ti+ • 3CO)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 100. ± 4.2 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Meyer and Armentrout, 1996 | RCD |
( • 3
) +
= (
• 4
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 3CO) + CO = (Ti+ • 4CO)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 87.0 ± 4.2 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Meyer and Armentrout, 1996 | RCD |
( • 4
) +
= (
• 5
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 4CO) + CO = (Ti+ • 5CO)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 69.9 ± 4.2 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Meyer and Armentrout, 1996 | RCD |
( • 5
) +
= (
• 6
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 5CO) + CO = (Ti+ • 6CO)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 74. ± 3. | kJ/mol | CIDT | Meyer and Armentrout, 1996 | RCD |
( • 6
) +
= (
• 7
)
By formula: (Ti+ • 6CO) + CO = (Ti+ • 7CO)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 51.9 ± 7.1 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Meyer and Armentrout, 1996 | RCD |
( •
) +
= (
• 2
)
By formula: (Ti+ • CO) + CO = (Ti+ • 2CO)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 113. ± 4.2 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Meyer and Armentrout, 1996 | RCD |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + C5H5N5 = (Ti+ • C5H5N5)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | ≤339. ± 15. | kJ/mol | CIDT | Rodgers and Armentrout, 2002 | RCD |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + H3N = (Ti+ • H3N)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 195. ± 7.1 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Walter and Armentrout, 1998 | RCD |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + C5H5N = (Ti+ • C5H5N)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 217. ± 9.6 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Rodgers, Stanley, et al., 2000 | RCD |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + CS = (Ti+ • CS)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 154. ± 5.9 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Rodgers and Armentrout, 2000 | RCD |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + C4H4N2 = (Ti+ • C4H4N2)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 214. ± 10. | kJ/mol | CIDT | Amunugama and Rodgers, 2001 | RCD |
+
= (
•
)
By formula: Ti+ + CO = (Ti+ • CO)
| Quantity | Value | Units | Method | Reference | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔrH° | 118. ± 5.9 | kJ/mol | CIDT | Meyer and Armentrout, 1996 | RCD |
References
Go To: Top, Reaction thermochemistry data, Notes
Data compilation copyright by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce on behalf of the U.S.A. All rights reserved.
Gapeev and Dunbar, 2002
Gapeev, A.; Dunbar, R.C.,
Reactivity and Binding Energies of Transition Metal Halide Ions with Benzene,
J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 2002, 13, 5, 477, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-0305(02)00373-2
. [all data]
Meyer, Khan, et al., 1995
Meyer, F.; Khan, F.A.; Armentrout, P.B.,
Thermochemistry of Transition Metal Benzene complexes: Binding energies of M(C6H6)x+ (x = 1,2) for M = Ti to Cu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 38, 9740, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00143a018
. [all data]
Magnera, David, et al., 1989
Magnera, T.F.; David, D.E.; Michl, J.,
Gas -Phase Water and Hydroxyl Binding Energies for Monopoisitive First - Row Transition - Metal Ions,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 11, 4101, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00193a051
. [all data]
Armentrout and Kickel, 1994
Armentrout, P.B.; Kickel, B.L.,
Gas Phase Thermochemistry of Transition Metal Ligand Systems: Reassessment of Values and Periodic Trends, in Organometallic Ion Chemistry, B. S. Freiser, ed, 1994. [all data]
Sievers, Jarvis, et al., 1998
Sievers, M.R.; Jarvis, L.M.; Armentrout, P.B.,
Transition Metal Ethene Bonds: Thermochemistry of M+(C2H4)n (M=Ti-Cu, n=1 and 2) Complexes,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 8, 1891, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja973834z
. [all data]
Walter and Armentrout, 1998
Walter, D.; Armentrout, P.B.,
Periodic Trends in Chemical Reactivity: Reactions of Sc+, Y+, La+, and Lu+ with H2, D2 and HD,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 13, 3176, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja973202c
. [all data]
Meyer and Armentrout, 1996
Meyer, F.; Armentrout, P.B.,
Sequential Bond Energies of Ti(CO)x+, x=1-7,
Molec. Phys., 1996, 88, 187. [all data]
Rodgers and Armentrout, 2002
Rodgers, M.T.; Armentrout, P.B.,
Influence of d orbital occupation on the binding of metal ions to adenine,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 11, 2678, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja011278+
. [all data]
Rodgers, Stanley, et al., 2000
Rodgers, M.T.; Stanley, J.R.; Amunugama, R.,
Periodic Trends in the Binding of Metal Ions to Pyridine Studied by Threshold Collision-Induced Dissociation and Density Functional Theory,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 44, 10969, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0027923
. [all data]
Rodgers and Armentrout, 2000
Rodgers, M.T.; Armentrout, P.B.,
Noncovalent Metal-Ligand Bond Energies as Studied by Threshold Collision-Induced Dissociation,
Mass Spectrom. Rev., 2000, 19, 4, 215, https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2787(200007)19:4<215::AID-MAS2>3.0.CO;2-X
. [all data]
Amunugama and Rodgers, 2001
Amunugama, R.; Rodgers, M.T.,
Periodic Trends in the Binding of Metal Ions to Pyrimidine Studied by Threshold Collision-Induced Dissociation and Density Functional Theory,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105, 43, 9883, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp010663i
. [all data]
Notes
Go To: Top, Reaction thermochemistry data, References
- Symbols used in this document:
T Temperature ΔrH° Enthalpy of reaction at standard conditions - Data from NIST Standard Reference Database 69: NIST Chemistry WebBook
- The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) uses its best efforts to deliver a high quality copy of the Database and to verify that the data contained therein have been selected on the basis of sound scientific judgment. However, NIST makes no warranties to that effect, and NIST shall not be liable for any damage that may result from errors or omissions in the Database.
- Customer support for NIST Standard Reference Data products.